The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated modelling of signal transduction networks
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Intracellular signal transduction is achieved by networks of proteins and small molecules that transmit information from the cell surface to the nucleus, where they ultimately effect transcriptional changes. Understanding the mechanisms cells use to accomplish this important process requires a detailed molecular description of the networks involved. RESULTS: We have developed a computational approach for generating static models of signal transduction networks which utilizes protein-interaction maps generated from large-scale two-hybrid screens and expression profiles from DNA microarrays. Networks are determined entirely by integrating protein-protein interaction data with microarray expression data, without prior knowledge of any pathway intermediates. In effect, this is equivalent to extracting subnetworks of the protein interaction dataset whose members have the most correlated expression profiles. CONCLUSION: We show that our technique accurately reconstructs MAP Kinase signaling networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This approach should enhance our ability to model signaling networks and to discover new components of known networks. More generally, it provides a method for synthesizing molecular data, either individual transcript abundance measurements or pairwise protein interactions, into higher level structures, such as pathways and networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
A motif-based profile scanning approach for genome-wide prediction of signaling pathways
Yaffe, M. B., Leparc, G. G., Lai, J., Obata, T., Volinia, S., & Cantley, L. C. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/86737 · Cited by 517
Cited by
WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis
Langfelder, P., & Horvath, S. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 · Cited by 27,252
Machine learning in bioinformatics
Larrañaga, P., Calvo, B., Santana, R., Bielza, C., Galdiano, J., Inza, I., Lozano, J. A., Armañanzas, R., Santafé, G., Pérez, A., et al. (2006) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbk007 · Cited by 867
Ideker, T., & Sharan, R. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.071852.107 · Cited by 817
Using genetic markers to orient the edges in quantitative trait networks: The NEO software
Aten, J. E., Fuller, T. F., Lusis, A. J., & Horvath, S. (2008) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-2-34 · Cited by 147
Co-expression networks: graph properties and topological comparisons
Xulvi-Brunet, R., & Li, H. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp632 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Steffen, M., Petti, A., Aach, J., D'haeseleer, P., & Church, G.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-34
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131532450
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.