The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizationof neural network architecture using genetic programming improvesdetection and modeling of gene-gene interactions in studies of humandiseases
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Appropriate definition of neural network architecture prior to data analysis is crucial for successful data mining. This can be challenging when the underlying model of the data is unknown. The goal of this study was to determine whether optimizing neural network architecture using genetic programming as a machine learning strategy would improve the ability of neural networks to model and detect nonlinear interactions among genes in studies of common human diseases. RESULTS: Using simulated data, we show that a genetic programming optimized neural network approach is able to model gene-gene interactions as well as a traditional back propagation neural network. Furthermore, the genetic programming optimized neural network is better than the traditional back propagation neural network approach in terms of predictive ability and power to detect gene-gene interactions when non-functional polymorphisms are present. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a machine learning strategy for optimizing neural network architecture may be preferable to traditional trial-and-error approaches for the identification and characterization of gene-gene interactions in common, complex human diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms
Mitchell, M. (1996) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3927.001.0001 · Cited by 11,340
Sexton, R. S., Dorsey, R. E., & Johnson, J. D. (1999) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00114-3 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Machine learning in bioinformatics
Larrañaga, P., Calvo, B., Santana, R., Bielza, C., Galdiano, J., Inza, I., Lozano, J. A., Armañanzas, R., Santafé, G., Pérez, A., et al. (2006) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbk007 · Cited by 867
Moore, J. H., Gilbert, J. C., Tsai, C.-T., Chiang, F.-T., Holden, T., Barney, N., & White, B. C. (2006) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.036 · Cited by 608
Self-citationReview and meta-analysis of antidepressant pharmacogenetic findings in major depressive disorder
Kato, M., & Serretti, A. (2010) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.116 · Cited by 450
Moore, J. H., & Williams, S. M. (2005) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20236 · Cited by 340
Self-citationEye color and the prediction of complex phenotypes from genotypes
Liu, F., van Duijn, K., Vingerling, J. R., Hofman, A., Uitterlinden, A. G., Janssens, A. C. J. W., & Kayser, M. (2009) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.027 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritchie, M. D., White, B. C., Parker, J. S., Hahn, L. W., & Moore, J. H.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2003-07-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-28
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009969871
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizationof neural network architecture using genetic programming improvesdetection and modeling of gene-gene interactions in studies of humandiseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-4-28
- The paper
- Ritchie, M. D., White, B. C., Parker, J. S., Hahn, L. W., & Moore, J. H. (2003). Optimizationof neural network architecture using genetic programming improvesdetection and modeling of gene-gene interactions in studies of humandiseases. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.