The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GOtcha: a new method for prediction of protein function assessed by the annotation of seven genomes
Open accessAbstract
Background: The function of a novel gene product is typically predicted by transitive assignment of annotation from similar sequences. We describe a novel method, GOtcha, for predicting gene product function by annotation with Gene Ontology (GO) terms. GOtcha predicts GO term associations with term-specific probability (P-score) measures of confidence. Term-specific probabilities are a novel feature of GOtcha and allow the identification of conflicts or uncertainty in annotation. Results: The GOtcha method was applied to the recently sequenced genome for Plasmodium falciparum and six other genomes. GOtcha was compared quantitatively for retrieval of assigned GO terms against direct transitive assignment from the highest scoring annotated BLAST search hit (TOPBLAST). GOtcha exploits information deep into the 'twilight zone' of similarity search matches, making use of much information that is otherwise discarded by more simplistic approaches. At a P-score cutoff of 50%, GOtcha provided 60% better recovery of annotation terms and 20% higher selectivity than annotation with TOPBLAST at an E-value cutoff of 10-4. Conclusions: The GOtcha method is a useful tool for genome annotators. It has identified both errors and omissions in the original Plasmodium falciparum annotation and is being adopted by many other genome sequencing projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complete Genome Structure of the Thermophilic Cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus BP-1
Nakamura, Y. (2002) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/9.4.123 · Cited by 352
Cited by
A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction
Radivojac, P., Clark, W. T., Oron, T. R., Schnoes, A. M., Wittkop, T., Sokolov, A., Graim, K., Funk, C., Verspoor, K., Ben-Hur, A., et al. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2340 · Cited by 1,028
Boadu, F., Cao, H., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad208 · Cited by 81
Zhang, C., Zheng, W., Freddolino, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.03.004 · Cited by 80
Zhou, J., & Wang, L. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01733 · Cited by 38
Zhang, C., Lane, L., Omenn, G. S., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00537 · Cited by 22
Zhang, C., & Freddolino, L. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae349 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, D. M., Berriman, M., & Barton, G. J.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2004-11-18
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 178-178
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167318540
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.