The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Processing methods for differential analysis of LC/MS profile data
Open accessAbstract
Background: Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC/MS) has been widely used in proteomics and metabolomics research. In this context, the technology has been increasingly used for differential profiling, i.e. broad screening of biomolecular components across multiple samples in order to elucidate the observed phenotypes and discover biomarkers. One of the major challenges in this domain remains development of better solutions for processing of LC/MS data. Results: We present a software package MZmine that enables differential LC/MS analysis of metabolomics data. This software is a toolbox containing methods for all data processing stages preceding differential analysis: spectral filtering, peak detection, alignment and normalization. Specifically, we developed and implemented a new recursive peak search algorithm and a secondary peak picking method for improving already aligned results, as well as a normalization tool that uses multiple internal standards. Visualization tools enable comparative viewing of data across multiple samples. Peak lists can be exported into other data analysis programs. The toolbox has already been utilized in a wide range of applications. We demonstrate its utility on an example of metabolic profiling of Catharanthus roseus cell cultures. Conclusion: The software is freely available under the GNU General Public License and it can be obtained from the project web page at: http://mzmine.sourceforge.net/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lommen, A. (2009) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac900036d · Cited by 734
Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics
Katajamaa, M., & Orešič, M. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.021 · Cited by 616
Analysis of the Adult Human Plasma Metabolome
Lawton, K. A., Berger, A., Mitchell, M., Milgram, K. E., Evans, A. M., Guo, L., Hanson, R. W., Kalhan, S. C., Ryals, J. A., & Milburn, M. V. (2008) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/14622416.9.4.383 · Cited by 490
Orešič, M., Simell, S., Sysi-Aho, M., Näntö-Salonen, K., Seppänen-Laakso, T., Parikka, V., Katajamaa, M., Hekkala, A., Mattila, I., Keskinen, P., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20081800 · Cited by 449
Self-citationGorrochategui, E., Jaumot, J., Lacorte, S., & Tauler, R. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2016.07.004 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Katajamaa, M., & Orešič, M.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2005-07-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 179-179
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1607252236
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processing methods for differential analysis of LC/MS profile data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-6-179
- The paper
- Katajamaa, M., & Orešič, M. (2005). Processing methods for differential analysis of LC/MS profile data. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.