The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ErmineJ: Tool for functional analysis of gene expression data sets
Open accessAbstract
Background: It is common for the results of a microarray study to be analyzed in the context of biologically-motivated groups of genes such as pathways or Gene Ontology categories. The most common method for such analysis uses the hypergeometric distribution (or a related technique) to look for "over-representation" of groups among genes selected as being differentially expressed or otherwise of interest based on a gene-by-gene analysis. However, this method suffers from some limitations, and biologist-friendly tools that implement alternatives have not been reported. Results: We introduce ErmineJ, a multiplatform user-friendly stand-alone software tool for the analysis of functionally-relevant sets of genes in the context of microarray gene expression data. ErmineJ implements multiple algorithms for gene set analysis, including over-representation and resampling-based methods that focus on gene scores or correlation of gene expression profiles. In addition to a graphical user interface, ErmineJ has a command line interface and an application programming interface that can be used to automate analyses. The graphical user interface includes tools for creating and modifying gene sets, visualizing the Gene Ontology as a table or tree, and visualizing gene expression data. ErmineJ comes with a complete user manual, and is open-source software licensed under the Gnu Public License. Conclusion: The availability of multiple analysis algorithms, together with a rich feature set and simple graphical interface, should make ErmineJ a useful addition to the biologist's informatics toolbox. ErmineJ is available from http://microarray.cu.genome.org.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
Cited by
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn923 · Cited by 14,108
Network-based prediction of human tissue-specific metabolism
Shlomi, T., Cabili, M. N., Herrgård, M. J., Palsson, B. Ø., & Ruppin, E. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1487 · Cited by 637
Plaisier, S. B., Taschereau, R., Wong, J. A., & Graeber, T. G. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq636 · Cited by 468
Sequeira, A., Mamdani, F., Ernst, C., Vawter, M. P., Bunney, W. E., Lebel, V., Rehal, S., Klempan, T., Gratton, A., Benkelfat, C., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006585 · Cited by 388
Gene-set approach for expression pattern analysis
Nam, D., & Kim, S.-Y. (2008) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbn001 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, H. K., Braynen, W., Keshav, K., & Pavlidis, P.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2005-11-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 269-269
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134889157
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ErmineJ: Tool for functional analysis of gene expression data sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-6-269
- The paper
- Lee, H. K., Braynen, W., Keshav, K., & Pavlidis, P. (2005). ErmineJ: Tool for functional analysis of gene expression data sets. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.