Cited by 338Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Gene-set approach for expression pattern analysis

Open access
Nam, D., Kim, S.-Y.·2008·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Abstract

Recently developed gene set analysis methods evaluate differential expression patterns of gene groups instead of those of individual genes. This approach especially targets gene groups whose constituents show subtle but coordinated expression changes, which might not be detected by the usual individual gene analysis. The approach has been quite successful in deriving new information from expression data, and a number of methods and tools have been developed intensively in recent years. We review those methods and currently available tools, classify them according to the statistical methods employed, and discuss their pros and cons. We also discuss several interesting extensions to the methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbn001

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nam, D., & Kim, S.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
ORCID
Nam, D.
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2008-01-11
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
189-197
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W2141703917
Cited by
338
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KRIBB Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science and Technology
  • National Institute for Materials Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
gene set analysis, differential gene expression, gene expression patterns, gene groups, statistical analysis, bioinformatics software
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Software, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review