The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines
Open accessAbstract
Background: T cells recognize a complex between a specific major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule and a particular pathogen-derived epitope. A given epitope will elicit a response only in individuals that express an MHC molecule capable of binding that particular epitope. MHC molecules are extremely polymorphic and over a thousand different human MHC (HLA) alleles are known. A disproportionate amount of MHC polymorphism occurs in positions constituting the peptide-binding region, and as a result, MHC molecules exhibit a widely varying binding specificity. In the design of peptide-based vaccines and diagnostics, the issue of population coverage in relation to MHC polymorphism is further complicated by the fact that different HLA types are expressed at dramatically different frequencies in different ethnicities. Thus, without careful consideration, a vaccine or diagnostic with ethnically biased population coverage could result. Results: To address this issue, an algorithm was developed to calculate, on the basis of HLA genotypic frequencies, the fraction of individuals expected to respond to a given epitope set, diagnostic or vaccine. The population coverage estimates are based on MHC binding and/or T cell restriction data, although the tool can be utilized in a more general fashion. The algorithm was implemented as a web-application available at http://epitope.liai.org:8080/tools/population. Conclusion: We have developed a web-based tool to predict population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines based on MHC binding and/or T cell restriction data. Accordingly, epitope-based vaccines or diagnostics can be designed to maximize population coverage, while minimizing complexity (that is, the number of different epitopes included in the diagnostic or vaccine), and also minimizing the variability of coverage obtained or projected in different ethnic groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tarke, A., Sidney, J., Kidd, C. K., Dan, J. M., Ramirez, S. I., Yu, E. D., Mateus, J., da Silva Antunes, R., Moore, E., Rubiro, P., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100204 · Cited by 540
Self-citationSARS-CoV-2-derived peptides define heterologous and COVID-19-induced T cell recognition
Nelde, A., Bilich, T., Heitmann, J. S., Maringer, Y., Salih, H. R., Roerden, M., Lübke, M., Bauer, J., Rieth, J., Wacker, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-020-00808-x · Cited by 582
Lee, L. Y.-H., Ha, D. L. A., Simmons, C., de Jong, M. D., Chau, N. V. V., Schumacher, R., Peng, Y. C., McMichael, A. J., Farrar, J. J., Smith, G. L., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci32460 · Cited by 422
An in silico deep learning approach to multi-epitope vaccine design: a SARS-CoV-2 case study
Yang, Z., Bogdan, P., & Nazarian, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81749-9 · Cited by 271
The Peptide Vaccine of the Future
Nelde, A., Rammensee, H.-G., & Walz, J. S. (2021) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r120.002309 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Bui, H.-H., Sidney, J., Dinh, K., Southwood, S., Newman, M. J., & Sette, A.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2006-03-17
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-153
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1503364994
- Cited by
- 975
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-7-153
- The paper
- Bui, H.-H., Sidney, J., Dinh, K., Southwood, S., Newman, M. J., & Sette, A. (2006). Predicting population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.