The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor
Open accessAbstract
Background: Repbase is a reference database of eukaryotic repetitive DNA, which includes prototypic sequences of repeats and basic information described in annotations. Updating and maintenance of the database requires specialized tools, which we have created and made available for use with Repbase, and which may be useful as a template for other curated databases. Results: We describe the software tools RepbaseSubmitter and Censor, which are designed to facilitate updating and screening the content of Repbase. RepbaseSubmitter is a java-based interface for formatting and annotating Repbase entries. It eliminates many common formatting errors, and automates actions such as calculation of sequence lengths and composition, thus facilitating curation of Repbase sequences. In addition, it has several features for predicting protein coding regions in sequences; searching and including Pubmed references in Repbase entries; and searching the NCBI taxonomy database for correct inclusion of species information and taxonomic position. Censor is a tool to rapidly identify repetitive elements by comparison to known repeats. It uses WU-BLAST for speed and sensitivity, and can conduct DNA-DNA, DNA-protein, or translated DNA-translated DNA searches of genomic sequence. Defragmented output includes a map of repeats present in the query sequence, with the options to report masked query sequence(s), repeat sequences found in the query, and alignments. Conclusion: Censor and RepbaseSubmitter are available as both web-based services and downloadable versions. They can be found at http://www.girinst.org/repbase/submission.html (RepbaseSubmitter) and http://www.girinst.org/censor/index.php (Censor).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Cited by
A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction
Radivojac, P., Clark, W. T., Oron, T. R., Schnoes, A. M., Wittkop, T., Sokolov, A., Graim, K., Funk, C., Verspoor, K., Ben-Hur, A., et al. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2340 · Cited by 1,028
The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line
Xu, X., Nagarajan, H., Lewis, N. E., Pan, S., Cai, Z., Liu, X., Chen, W., Xie, M., Wang, W., Hammond, S., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1932 · Cited by 785
DICER1 deficit induces Alu RNA toxicity in age-related macular degeneration
Kaneko, H., Dridi, S., Tarallo, V., Gelfand, B. D., Fowler, B. J., Cho, W. G., Kleinman, M. E., Ponicsan, S. L., Hauswirth, W. W., Chiodo, V. A., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09830 · Cited by 601
A mosaic monoploid reference sequence for the highly complex genome of sugarcane
Garsmeur, O., Droc, G., Antonise, R., Grimwood, J., Potier, B., Aitken, K., Jenkins, J., Martin, G., Charron, C., Hervouet, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05051-5 · Cited by 452
Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living
Kapheim, K. M., Pan, H., Li, C., Salzberg, S. L., Puiu, D., Magoc, T., Robertson, H. M., Hudson, M. E., Venkat, A., Fischman, B. J., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4788 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohany, O., Gentles, A. J., Hankus, L., & Jurka, J.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2006-10-25
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 474-474
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104789942
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-7-474
- The paper
- Kohany, O., Gentles, A. J., Hankus, L., & Jurka, J. (2006). Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-474
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
