The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies
Open accessAbstract
Background: Character mapping on phylogenies has played an important, if not critical role, in our understanding of molecular, morphological, and behavioral evolution. Until very recently we have relied on parsimony to infer character changes. Parsimony has a number of serious limitations that are drawbacks to our understanding. Recent statistical methods have been developed that free us from these limitations enabling us to overcome the problems of parsimony by accommodating uncertainty in evolutionary time, ancestral states, and the phylogeny. Results: SIMMAP has been developed to implement stochastic character mapping that is useful to both molecular evolutionists, systematists, and bioinformaticians. Researchers can address questions about positive selection, patterns of amino acid substitution, character association, and patterns of morphological evolution. Conclusion: Stochastic character mapping, as implemented in the SIMMAP software, enables users to address questions that require mapping characters onto phylogenies using a probabilistic approach that does not rely on parsimony. Analyses can be performed using a fully Bayesian approach that is not reliant on considering a single topology, set of substitution model parameters, or reconstruction of ancestral states. Uncertainty in these quantities is accommodated by using MCMC samples from their respective posterior distributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data
Lewis, P. O. (2001) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/106351501753462876 · Cited by 2,929
Cited by
Phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.16505 · Cited by 1,244
Kayal, E., Bentlage, B., Sabrina Pankey, M., Ohdera, A. H., Medina, M., Plachetzki, D. C., Collins, A. G., & Ryan, J. F. (2018) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-018-1142-0 · Cited by 255
“We applied stochastic character mapping [53, 54, 55] to reconstruct ancestral character states for selected traits on our topology (Fig.”
InfluentialField, D. J., Bercovici, A., Berv, J. S., Dunn, R., Fastovsky, D. E., Lyson, T. R., Vajda, V., & Gauthier, J. A. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.062 · Cited by 150
Evolution of Stress-Regulated Gene Expression in Duplicate Genes of Arabidopsis thaliana
Zou, C., Lehti-Shiu, M. D., Thomashow, M., & Shiu, S.-H. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000581 · Cited by 149
Generalized hidden Markov models for phylogenetic comparative datasets
Boyko, J. D., & Beaulieu, J. M. (2021) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13534 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Bollback, J. P.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2006-02-23
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-88
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118207809
- Cited by
- 940
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-7-88
- The paper
- Bollback, J. P. (2006). SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-88
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.