The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QuantPrime – a flexible tool for reliable high-throughput primer design for quantitative PCR
Open accessAbstract
Background: Medium- to large-scale expression profiling using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays are becoming increasingly important in genomics research. A major bottleneck in experiment preparation is the design of specific primer pairs, where researchers have to make several informed choices, often outside their area of expertise. Using currently available primer design tools, several interactive decisions have to be made, resulting in lengthy design processes with varying qualities of the assays. Results: Here we present QuantPrime, an intuitive and user-friendly, fully automated tool for primer pair design in small- to large-scale qPCR analyses. QuantPrime can be used online through the internet http://www.quantprime.de/ or on a local computer after download; it offers design and specificity checking with highly customizable parameters and is ready to use with many publicly available transcriptomes of important higher eukaryotic model organisms and plant crops (currently 295 species in total), while benefiting from exon-intron border and alternative splice variant information in available genome annotations. Experimental results with the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the crop Hordeum vulgare and the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii show success rates of designed primer pairs exceeding 96%. Conclusion: QuantPrime constitutes a flexible, fully automated web application for reliable primer design for use in larger qPCR experiments, as proven by experimental data. The flexible framework is also open for simple use in other quantification applications, such as hydrolyzation probe design for qPCR and oligonucleotide probe design for quantitative in situ hybridization. Future suggestions made by users can be easily implemented, thus allowing QuantPrime to be developed into a broad-range platform for the design of RNA expression assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Cited by
Wu, A., Allu, A. D., Garapati, P., Siddiqui, H., Dortay, H., Zanor, M.-I., Asensi-Fabado, M. A., Munné-Bosch, S., Antonio, C., Tohge, T., et al. (2012) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.090894 · Cited by 601
Self-citationMakkena, S., & Lamb, R. S. (2013) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-13-1 · Cited by 462
Mapping of signaling networks through synthetic genetic interaction analysis by RNAi
Horn, T., Sandmann, T., Fischer, B., Axelsson, E., Huber, W., & Boutros, M. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1581 · Cited by 193
Koyuncu, E., Purdy, J. G., Rabinowitz, J. D., & Shenk, T. (2013) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003333 · Cited by 114
Characterization of MORE AXILLARY GROWTH Genes in Populus
Czarnecki, O., Yang, J., Wang, X., Wang, S., Muchero, W., Tuskan, G. A., & Chen, J.-G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102757 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Arvidsson, S., Kwasniewski, M., Riaño-Pachón, D. M., & Mueller-Roeber, B.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2008-11-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 465-465
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131463690
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QuantPrime – a flexible tool for reliable high-throughput primer design for quantitative PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-9-465
- The paper
- Arvidsson, S., Kwasniewski, M., Riaño-Pachón, D. M., & Mueller-Roeber, B. (2008). QuantPrime – a flexible tool for reliable high-throughput primer design for quantitative PCR. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-465
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.