Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modularity as a source of new morphological variation in the mandible of hybrid mice

Renaud, Sabrina, Alibert, Paul, Auffray, Jean-Christophe·2012·BMC Evolutionary Biology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2148-12-141

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It has been suggested and evidenced that hybridization may release evolutionary constraints on phenotypic integration, affecting not only variation in traits but also the relationship between traits.

    “It has been suggested and evidenced that hybridization may release evolutionary constraints on phenotypic integration, affecting not only variation in traits but also the relationship between traits (e.g., head shape in African cichlids, Parsons et al. 2011; modularity in mouse mandible, Renaud et al. 2012).”

    From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Renaud et al. 2012

    The Discussion (‘A mosaic of modules in hybrids’) reports new mandible shapes arising from different combinations of modules, supporting the claim about variation in traits. The Results (‘Integration among modules’) examine relationships between modules, but the Discussion (‘Remodeling as an adjustment between neighboring modules?’) says no general pattern of integration emerged and notes a covariation that persisted in parents and hybrids. The paper therefore does not establish that hybridization released constraints on phenotypic integration. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These cichlid and mouse data show that release from evolutionary constraints of phenotypic traits can occur in the F2 generation and then continue in later hybrid generations.

    “These cichlid and mouse data show that release from evolutionary constraints of phenotypic traits can occur in the F2 generation and then continue in later hybrid generations.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.9995 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.050586297 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/jez.b.21101 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2411190 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2007.00297.x · DOI
  6. 10.1017/S0952836901000747 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05297.x · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01947.x · DOI
  9. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-169 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2001.tb01325.x · DOI
  11. 10.1186/1742-9994-2-11 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11692-011-9126-7 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3231 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00599.x · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.1000133107 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/1471-2148-11-309 · DOI
  17. 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1909 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02312.x · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1991.tb01138.x · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03057.x · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2005.05047.x · DOI
  22. 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001003 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/sysbio/42.4.523 · DOI
  24. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0141 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00457.x · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00065.x · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00114-009-0563-4 · DOI
  28. 10.1098/rstb.2003.1283 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.021 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/2411057 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2005.00323.x · DOI
  33. 10.1080/10635150701648029 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/2529140 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00347.x · DOI
  36. 10.1080/106351500750049806 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(199702)231:2<131::AID-JMOR2>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  38. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00568.x · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.020 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2009.00527.x · DOI
  41. 10.1002/jmor.10517 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00290.x · DOI
  43. 10.1007/s11692-009-9075-6 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Renaud, S., Alibert, P., & Auffray, J.-C.
Venue
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Published
2012
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
141
ISSN
1471-2148
Cited by
51
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review