The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The extant squamates (>9400 known species of lizards and snakes) are one of the most diverse and conspicuous radiations of terrestrial vertebrates, but no studies have attempted to reconstruct a phylogeny for the group with large-scale taxon sampling. Such an estimate is invaluable for comparative evolutionary studies, and to address their classification. Here, we present the first large-scale phylogenetic estimate for Squamata. RESULTS: The estimated phylogeny contains 4161 species, representing all currently recognized families and subfamilies. The analysis is based on up to 12896 base pairs of sequence data per species (average = 2497 bp) from 12 genes, including seven nuclear loci (BDNF, c-mos, NT3, PDC, R35, RAG-1, and RAG-2), and five mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S, cytochrome b, ND2, and ND4). The tree provides important confirmation for recent estimates of higher-level squamate phylogeny based on molecular data (but with more limited taxon sampling), estimates that are very different from previous morphology-based hypotheses. The tree also includes many relationships that differ from previous molecular estimates and many that differ from traditional taxonomy. CONCLUSIONS: We present a new large-scale phylogeny of squamate reptiles that should be a valuable resource for future comparative studies. We also present a revised classification of squamates at the family and subfamily level to bring the taxonomy more in line with the new phylogenetic hypothesis. This classification includes new, resurrected, and modified subfamilies within gymnophthalmid and scincid lizards, and boid, colubrid, and lamprophiid snakes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., & Gascuel, O. (2010) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · Cited by 18,376
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data
Heled, J., & Drummond, A. J. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp274 · Cited by 2,453
Resolution of Phylogenetic Conflict in Large Data Sets by Increased Taxon Sampling
Hedtke, S. M., Townsend, T. M., & Hillis, D. M. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600697358 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Phylotranscriptomic consolidation of the jawed vertebrate timetree
Irisarri, I., Baurain, D., Brinkmann, H., Delsuc, F., Sire, J.-Y., Kupfer, A., Petersen, J., Jarek, M., Meyer, A., Vences, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0240-5 · Cited by 299
“The results of these correlation analyses were confirmed by a Bayesian joint modelling of the above traits with parameters of the evolutionary process at the sequence level (see Supplementary Table 7).”
Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery
Moura, M. R., & Jetz, W. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01411-5 · Cited by 196
Microchromosomes are building blocks of bird, reptile, and mammal chromosomes
Waters, P. D., Patel, H. R., Ruiz-Herrera, A., Álvarez-González, L., Lister, N. C., Simakov, O., Ezaz, T., Kaur, P., Frere, C., Grützner, F., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2112494118 · Cited by 153
Bittenbinder, M. A., van Thiel, J., Cardoso, F. C., Casewell, N. R., Gutiérrez, J.-M., Kool, J., & Vonk, F. J. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06019-6 · Cited by 132
Adams, R. H., Blackmon, H., Reyes-Velasco, J., Schield, D. R., Card, D. C., Andrew, A. L., Waynewood, N., & Castoe, T. A. (2016) · Genome · doi:10.1139/gen-2015-0124 · Cited by 50
Sex chromosome evolution among amniotes: is the origin of sex chromosomes non-random?
Kratochvíl, L., Gamble, T., & Rovatsos, M. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0108 · Cited by 48
The palatal dentition of tetrapods and its functional significance
Matsumoto, R., & Evans, S. E. (2017) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12534 · Cited by 44
Roscito, J. G., Sameith, K., Kirilenko, B. M., Hecker, N., Winkler, S., Dahl, A., Rodrigues, M. T., & Hiller, M. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110280 · Cited by 44
Gene Turnover and Diversification of the α- and β-Globin Gene Families in Sauropsid Vertebrates
Hoffmann, F. G., Vandewege, M. W., Storz, J. F., & Opazo, J. C. (2018) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evy001 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Pyron, R., Burbrink, F. T., & Wiens, J. J.
- Venue
- BMC Evolutionary Biology
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93
- ISSN
- 1471-2148 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115556561
- Cited by
- 1,641
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 113.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.