The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An application of Random Forests to a genome-wide association dataset: Methodological considerations & new findings
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: As computational power improves, the application of more advanced machine learning techniques to the analysis of large genome-wide association (GWA) datasets becomes possible. While most traditional statistical methods can only elucidate main effects of genetic variants on risk for disease, certain machine learning approaches are particularly suited to discover higher order and non-linear effects. One such approach is the Random Forests (RF) algorithm. The use of RF for SNP discovery related to human disease has grown in recent years; however, most work has focused on small datasets or simulation studies which are limited. RESULTS: Using a multiple sclerosis (MS) case-control dataset comprised of 300 K SNP genotypes across the genome, we outline an approach and some considerations for optimally tuning the RF algorithm based on the empirical dataset. Importantly, results show that typical default parameter values are not appropriate for large GWA datasets. Furthermore, gains can be made by sub-sampling the data, pruning based on linkage disequilibrium (LD), and removing strong effects from RF analyses. The new RF results are compared to findings from the original MS GWA study and demonstrate overlap. In addition, four new interesting candidate MS genes are identified, MPHOSPH9, CTNNA3, PHACTR2 and IL7, by RF analysis and warrant further follow-up in independent studies. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents one of the first illustrations of successfully analyzing GWA data with a machine learning algorithm. It is shown that RF is computationally feasible for GWA data and the results obtained make biologic sense based on previous studies. More importantly, new genes were identified as potentially being associated with MS, suggesting new avenues of investigation for this complex disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
Risk Alleles for Multiple Sclerosis Identified by a Genomewide Study
(2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa073493 · Cited by 1,746
Cited by
How Many Trees in a Random Forest?
Oshiro, T. M., Perez, P. S., & Baranauskas, J. A. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_13 · Cited by 912
Goldstein, B. A., Navar, A. M., & Carter, R. E. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw302 · Cited by 543
Self-citationRandom Forests for Genetic Association Studies
Goldstein, B. A., Polley, E. C., & Briggs, F. B. S. (2011) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1691 · Cited by 272
Self-citationA new variable selection approach using Random Forests
Hapfelmeier, A., & Ulm, K. (2013) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2012.09.020 · Cited by 259
Oxidative Stress and Metabolic Perturbations in Wooden Breast Disorder in Chickens
Abasht, B., Mutryn, M. F., Michalek, R. D., & Lee, W. R. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153750 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstein, B. A., Hubbard, A. E., Cutler, A., & Barcellos, L. F.
- Venue
- BMC Genetics
- Published
- 2010-06-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-49
- ISSN
- 1471-2156 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158416439
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An application of Random Forests to a genome-wide association dataset: Methodological considerations & new findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2156-11-49
- The paper
- Goldstein, B. A., Hubbard, A. E., Cutler, A., & Barcellos, L. F. (2010). An application of Random Forests to a genome-wide association dataset: Methodological considerations & new findings. BMC Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.