The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of two commercial global miRNA expression profiling platforms for detection of less abundant miRNAs
Open accessAbstract
Background: microRNAs (miRNA) are short, endogenous transcripts that negatively regulate the expression of specific mRNA targets. miRNAs are found both in tissues and body fluids such as plasma. A major perspective for the use of miRNAs in the clinical setting is as diagnostic plasma markers for neoplasia. While miRNAs are abundant in tissues, they are often scarce in plasma. For quantification of miRNA in plasma it is therefore of importance to use a platform with high sensitivity and linear performance in the low concentration range. This motivated us to evaluate the performance of three commonly used commercial miRNA quantification platforms: GeneChip miRNA 2.0 Array, miRCURY Ready-to-Use PCR, Human panel I+II V1.M, and TaqMan Human MicroRNA Array v3.0. Results: Using synthetic miRNA samples and plasma RNA samples spiked with different ratios of 174 synthetic miRNAs we assessed the performance characteristics reproducibility, recovery, specificity, sensitivity and linearity. It was found that while the qRT-PCR based platforms were sufficiently sensitive to reproducibly detect miRNAs at the abundance levels found in human plasma, the array based platform was not. At high miRNA levels both qRT-PCR based platforms performed well in terms of specificity, reproducibility and recovery. At low miRNA levels, as in plasma, the miRCURY platform showed better sensitivity and linearity than the TaqMan platform. Conclusion: For profiling clinical samples with low miRNA abundance, such as plasma samples, the miRCURY platform with its better sensitivity and linearity would probably be superior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities
Ozsolak, F., & Milos, P. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2934 · Cited by 2,135 · cited 1×
“approaches are being pursued to bring input requirements down, and the results are promising [27].”
Background
Cited by
MicroRNA profiling: approaches and considerations
Pritchard, C. C., Cheng, H. H., & Tewari, M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3198 · Cited by 1,765
Assessing sample and miRNA profile quality in serum and plasma or other biofluids
Blondal, T., Jensby Nielsen, S., Baker, A., Andreasen, D., Mouritzen, P., Wrang Teilum, M., & Dahlsveen, I. K. (2013) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.09.015 · Cited by 687
Evaluation of quantitative miRNA expression platforms in the microRNA quality control (miRQC) study
Mestdagh, P., Hartmann, N., Baeriswyl, L., Andreasen, D., Bernard, N., Chen, C., Cheo, D., D'Andrade, P., DeMayo, M., Dennis, L., et al. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3014 · Cited by 660
Methodological challenges in utilizing mi RNA s as circulating biomarkers
Moldovan, L., Batte, K. E., Trgovcich, J., Wisler, J., Marsh, C. B., & Piper, M. (2014) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/jcmm.12236 · Cited by 436
Ostenfeld, M. S., Jeppesen, D. K., Laurberg, J. R., Boysen, A. T., Bramsen, J. B., Primdal-Bengtson, B., Hendrix, A., Lamy, P., Dagnaes-Hansen, F., Rasmussen, M. H., et al. (2014) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3512 · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, S. G., Lamy, P., Rasmussen, M. H., Ostenfeld, M. S., Dyrskjøt, L., Ørntoft, T. F., & Andersen, C. L.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2011-08-26
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 435-435
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135899969
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of two commercial global miRNA expression profiling platforms for detection of less abundant miRNAs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-12-435
- The paper
- Jensen, S. G., Lamy, P., Rasmussen, M. H., Ostenfeld, M. S., Dyrskjøt, L., Ørntoft, T. F., & Andersen, C. L. (2011). Evaluation of two commercial global miRNA expression profiling platforms for detection of less abundant miRNAs. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.