Cited by 2,135Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsRNA Research and Splicing

RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities

Open access
Ozsolak, Fatih, Milos, Patrice M.·2011·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

In the few years since its initial application, massively parallel cDNA sequencing, or RNA-seq, has allowed many advances in the characterization and quantification of transcriptomes. Recently, several developments in RNA-seq methods have provided an even more complete characterization of RNA transcripts. These developments include improvements in transcription start site mapping, strand-specific measurements, gene fusion detection, small RNA characterization and detection of alternative splicing events. Ongoing developments promise further advances in the application of RNA-seq, particularly direct RNA sequencing and approaches that allow RNA quantification from very small amounts of cellular materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg2934

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RNA-seq provides a powerful tool to decipher global gene expression patterns far beyond the limitations of microarrays.

    “RNA deep-sequencing (RNA-seq) provides a powerful tool to decipher global gene expression patterns far beyond the limitations of microarrays, including an unprecedented capability to discover novel genes, alternative transcript variants, chimeric transcripts, and expressed sequence variants as well as allele-specific expression [8–12].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozsolak, F., & Milos, P. M.
Affiliations
Helicos Biosciences (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ozsolak, Fatih
  • Milos, Patrice M.
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2010-12-30
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
87-98
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2060842569
Cited by
2,135
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 141 · 2017: 173 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 169 · 2014: 169 · 2013: 168 · 2012: 152
FWCI
10.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG005230, R44HG005279)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
RNA sequencing, transcriptome, direct RNA sequencing, RNA quantification, strand-specific RNA-seq, fusion gene detection, small RNA, alternative splicing
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, RNA, Transcription, Genetic, Alternative Splicing, Sequence Analysis, RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review