The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi
Open accessAbstract
EDITOR'S NOTE: Readers are alerted that there is currently a discussion regarding the use of some of the unpublished genomic data presented in this manuscript. Appropriate editorial action will be taken once this matter is resolved. Background: Fungi produce a variety of carbohydrate activity enzymes (CAZymes) for the degradation of plant polysaccharide materials to facilitate infection and/or gain nutrition. Identifying and comparing CAZymes from fungi with different nutritional modes or infection mechanisms may provide information for better understanding of their life styles and infection models. To date, over hundreds of fungal genomes are publicly available. However, a systematic comparative analysis of fungal CAZymes across the entire fungal kingdom has not been reported. Results: In this study, we systemically identified glycoside hydrolases (GHs), polysaccharide lyases (PLs), carbohydrate esterases (CEs), and glycosyltransferases (GTs) as well as carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) in the predicted proteomes of 103 representative fungi from Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, and Zygomycota. Comparative analysis of these CAZymes that play major roles in plant polysaccharide degradation revealed that fungi exhibit tremendous diversity in the number and variety of CAZymes. Among them, some families of GHs and CEs are the most prevalent CAZymes that are distributed in all of the fungi analyzed. Importantly, cellulases of some GH families are present in fungi that are not known to have cellulose-degrading ability. In addition, our results also showed that in general, plant pathogenic fungi have the highest number of CAZymes. Biotrophic fungi tend to have fewer CAZymes than necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungi. Pathogens of dicots often contain more pectinases than fungi infecting monocots. Interestingly, besides yeasts, many saprophytic fungi that are highly active in degrading plant biomass contain fewer CAZymes than plant pathogenic fungi. Furthermore, analysis of the gene expression profile of the wheat scab fungus Fusarium graminearum revealed that most of the CAZyme genes related to cell wall degradation were up-regulated during plant infection. Phylogenetic analysis also revealed a complex history of lineage-specific expansions and attritions for the PL1 family. Conclusions: Our study provides insights into the variety and expansion of fungal CAZyme classes and revealed the relationship of CAZyme size and diversity with their nutritional strategy and host specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution
Abascal, F., Zardoya, R., & Posada, D. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263 · Cited by 3,063
Fueling the future with fungal genomics
Grigoriev, I. V., Cullen, D., Goodwin, S. B., Hibbett, D., Jeffries, T. W., Kubicek, C. P., Kuske, C., Magnuson, J. K., Martin, F., Spatafora, J. W., et al. (2011) · Mycology · doi:10.1080/21501203.2011.584577 · Cited by 250 · cited 1×
“org/science/projects/ projects), 30 were obtained from GenBank of NCBI, 23 were downloaded from DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) site [52], and 1 was downloaded from BluGen (http://www.”
Method
Cited by
Baroncelli, R., Amby, D. B., Zapparata, A., Sarrocco, S., Vannacci, G., Le Floch, G., Harrison, R. J., Holub, E., Sukno, S. A., Sreenivasaprasad, S., et al. (2016) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2917-6 · Cited by 179
Tools of the crook-infection strategies of fungal plant pathogens
Rodriguez‐Moreno, L., Ebert, M. K., Bolton, M. D., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13810 · Cited by 130
Gan, P., Narusaka, M., Kumakura, N., Tsushima, A., Takano, Y., Narusaka, Y., & Shirasu, K. (2016) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evw089 · Cited by 98
Stress-Tolerant Yeasts: Opportunistic Pathogenicity Versus Biocontrol Potential
Zajc, J., Gostinčar, C., Černoša, A., & Gunde-Cimerman, N. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10010042 · Cited by 87
Lignocellulose degradation in isopods: new insights into the adaptation to terrestrial life
Bredon, M., Herran, B., Lheraud, B., Bertaux, J., Grève, P., Moumen, B., & Bouchon, D. (2019) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-019-5825-8 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Z., Liu, H., Wang, C., & Xu, J.-R.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 274-274
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144923485
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-14-274
- The paper
- Zhao, Z., Liu, H., Wang, C., & Xu, J.-R. (2013). Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.