The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) played an important role in shaping microbial genomes. In addition to genes under sporadic selection, HGT also affects housekeeping genes and those involved in information processing, even ribosomal RNA encoding genes. Here we describe tools that provide an assessment and graphic illustration of the mosaic nature of microbial genomes. RESULTS: We adapted the Maximum Likelihood (ML) mapping to the analyses of all detected quartets of orthologous genes found in four genomes. We have automated the assembly and analyses of these quartets of orthologs given the selection of four genomes. We compared the ML-mapping approach to more rigorous Bayesian probability and Bootstrap mapping techniques. The latter two approaches appear to be more conservative than the ML-mapping approach, but qualitatively all three approaches give equivalent results. All three tools were tested on mitochondrial genomes, which presumably were inherited as a single linkage group. CONCLUSIONS: In some instances of interphylum relationships we find nearly equal numbers of quartets strongly supporting the three possible topologies. In contrast, our analyses of genome quartets containing the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. indicate that a large part of the cyanobacterial genome is related to that of low GC Gram positives. Other groups that had been suggested as sister groups to the cyanobacteria contain many fewer genes that group with the Synechocystis orthologs. Interdomain comparisons of genome quartets containing the archaeon Halobacterium sp. revealed that Halobacterium sp. shares more genes with Bacteria that live in the same environment than with Bacteria that are more closely related based on rRNA phylogeny. Many of these genes encode proteins involved in substrate transport and metabolism and in information storage and processing. The performed analyses demonstrate that relationships among prokaryotes cannot be accurately depicted by or inferred from the tree-like evolution of a core of rarely transferred genes; rather prokaryotic genomes are mosaics in which different parts have different evolutionary histories. Probability mapping is a valuable tool to explore the mosaic nature of genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences
Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · Cited by 6,947
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution
Tatusov, R. L. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.33 · Cited by 4,520
Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms
Woese, C. R., & Fox, G. E. (1977) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088 · Cited by 4,131
Cited by
Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution
Gogarten, J. P., & Townsend, J. P. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1204 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationProkaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer
Gogarten, J. P., Doolittle, W. F., & Lawrence, J. G. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004046 · Cited by 986
Self-citationFungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
From Gene Trees to Organismal Phylogeny in Prokaryotes:The Case of the γ-Proteobacteria
Lerat, E., Daubin, V., & Moran, N. A. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000019 · Cited by 431
Genome trees and the tree of life
Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B., Grishin, N. V., & Koonin, E. V. (2002) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02744-0 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhaxybayeva, O., & Gogarten, J. P.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2002-02-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-4
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096118116
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-3-4
- The paper
- Zhaxybayeva, O., & Gogarten, J. P. (2002). Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-3-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.