The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An improved method for rapid generation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa deletion mutants
Open accessAbstract
Background: Traditional gene replacement procedures are still time-consuming. They usually necessitate cloning of the gene to be mutated, insertional inactivation of the gene with an antibiotic resistance cassette and exchange of the plasmid-borne mutant allele with the bacterial chromosome. PCR and recombinational technologies can be exploited to substantially accelerate virtually all steps involved in the gene replacement process. Results: We describe a method for rapid generation of unmarked P. aeruginosa deletion mutants. Three partially overlapping DNA fragments are amplified and then spliced together in vitro by overlap extension PCR. The resulting DNA fragment is cloned in vitro into the Gateway vector pDONR221 and then recombined into the Gateway-compatible gene replacement vector pEX18ApGW. The plasmid-borne deletions are next transferred to the P. aeruginosa chromosome by homologous recombination. Unmarked deletion mutants are finally obtained by Flp-mediated excision of the antibiotic resistance marker. The method was applied to deletion of 25 P. aeruginosa genes encoding transcriptional regulators of the GntR family. Conclusion: While maintaining the key features of traditional gene replacement procedures, for example, suicide delivery vectors, antibiotic resistance selection and sucrose counterselection, the method described here is considerably faster due to streamlining of some of the key steps involved in the process, especially plasmid-borne mutant allele construction and its transfer into the target host. With appropriate modifications, the method should be applicable to other bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections
Bjarnsholt, T. (2013) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/apm.12099 · Cited by 1,080
Barken, K. B., Pamp, S. J., Yang, L., Gjermansen, M., Bertrand, J. J., Klausen, M., Givskov, M., Whitchurch, C. B., Engel, J. N., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T. (2008) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01658.x · Cited by 418
ZnuA and zinc homeostasis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pederick, V. G., Eijkelkamp, B. A., Begg, S. L., Ween, M. P., McAllister, L. J., Paton, J. C., & McDevitt, C. A. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13139 · Cited by 138
Sass, G., Nazik, H., Penner, J., Shah, H., Ansari, S. R., Clemons, K. V., Groleau, M.-C., Dietl, A.-M., Visca, P., Haas, H., et al. (2018) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00345-17 · Cited by 128
McPherson, C. J., Aschenbrenner, L. M., Lacey, B. M., Fahnoe, K. C., Lemmon, M. M., Finegan, S. M., Tadakamalla, B., O'Donnell, J. P., Mueller, J. P., & Tomaras, A. P. (2012) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01345-12 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, K.-H., & Schweizer, H. P.
- Venue
- BMC Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-05-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-30
- ISSN
- 1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122992192
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved method for rapid generation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa deletion mutants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2180-5-30
- The paper
- Choi, K.-H., & Schweizer, H. P. (2005). An improved method for rapid generation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa deletion mutants. BMC Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-5-30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.