Cited by 19Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCellular transport and secretion

Dynamic visualization of membrane-inserted fraction of pHluorin-tagged channels using repetitive acidification technique

Open access
Khiroug, Serguei S, Pryazhnikov, Evgeny, Coleman, Sarah K, Jeromin, Andreas, Keinänen, Kari, Khiroug, Leonard·2009·BMC Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changes in neuronal excitability, synaptic efficacy and generally in cell signaling often result from insertion of key molecules into plasma membrane (PM). Many of the techniques used for monitoring PM insertion lack either spatial or temporal resolution. RESULTS: We improved the imaging method based on time-lapse total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy and pHluorin tagging by supplementing it with a repetitive extracellular acidification protocol. We illustrate the applicability of this method by showing that brief activation of NMDA receptors ("chemical LTP") in cultured hippocampal neurons induced a persistent PM insertion of glutamate receptors containing the pHluorin-tagged GluR-A(flip) subunits. CONCLUSION: The repetitive acidification technique provides a more accurate way of monitoring the PM-inserted fraction of fluorescently tagged molecules and offers a good temporal and spatial resolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2202-10-141

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khiroug, S. S., Pryazhnikov, E., Coleman, S. K., Jeromin, A., Keinänen, K., & Khiroug, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
Corresponding author
Khiroug, Leonard
Venue
BMC Neuroscience
Published
2009-11-30
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
141-141
ISSN
1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028397158
Cited by
19
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland
  • Kansainvälisen Liikkuvuuden ja Yhteistyön Keskus
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
membrane insertion, pHluorin, NMDA receptor activation, AMPA receptor subunits, hippocampal neurons, glutamate receptors, dynamic visualization
MeSH terms
Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review