The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated quantitative gait analysis in animal models of movement disorders
Open accessAbstract
Background: Accurate and reproducible behavioral tests in animal models are of major importance in the development and evaluation of new therapies for central nervous system disease. In this study we investigated for the first time gait parameters of rat models for Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD) and stroke using the Catwalk method, a novel automated gait analysis test. Static and dynamic gait parameters were measured in all animal models, and these data were compared to readouts of established behavioral tests, such as the cylinder test in the PD and stroke rats and the rotarod tests for the HD group. Results: Hemiparkinsonian rats were generated by unilateral injection of the neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine in the striatum or in the medial forebrain bundle. For Huntington's disease, a transgenic rat model expressing a truncated huntingtin fragment with multiple CAG repeats was used. Thirdly, a stroke model was generated by a photothrombotic induced infarct in the right sensorimotor cortex. We found that multiple gait parameters were significantly altered in all three disease models compared to their respective controls. Behavioural deficits could be efficiently measured using the cylinder test in the PD and stroke animals, and in the case of the PD model, the deficits in gait essentially confirmed results obtained by the cylinder test. However, in the HD model and the stroke model the Catwalk analysis proved more sensitive than the rotarod test and also added new and more detailed information on specific gait parameters. Conclusion: The automated quantitative gait analysis test may be a useful tool to study both motor impairment and recovery associated with various neurological motor disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Induction of reproducible brain infarction by photochemically initiated thrombosis
Watson, B. D., Dietrich, W. D., Busto, R., Wachtel, M. S., & Ginsberg, M. D. (1985) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410170513 · Cited by 1,135
Comparative Analysis of Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Serotypes 1, 2, 5, 7, And 8 in Mouse Brain
Taymans, J.-M., Vandenberghe, L. H., Haute, C. V. D., Thiry, I., Deroose, C. M., Mortelmans, L., Wilson, J. M., Debyser, Z., & Baekelandt, V. (2007) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2006.178 · Cited by 305
Self-citationDifferential vulnerability of central neurons of the rat to quinolinic acid
Schwarcz, R., & Köhler, C. (1983) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(83)90115-5 · Cited by 239
Mazarakis, N. K., Cybulska-Klosowicz, A., Grote, H., Pang, T., Van Dellen, A., Kossut, M., Blakemore, C., & Hannan, A. J. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4320-04.2005 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice
Deacon, R. M. J. (2013) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/2609 · Cited by 484
d'Ydewalle, C., Krishnan, J., Chiheb, D. M., Van Damme, P., Irobi, J., Kozikowski, A. P., Berghe, P. V., Timmerman, V., Robberecht, W., & Van Den Bosch, L. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2396 · Cited by 454
Fasudil attenuates aggregation of α-synuclein in models of Parkinson’s disease
Tatenhorst, L., Eckermann, K., Dambeck, V., Fonseca-Ornelas, L., Walle, H., Lopes da Fonseca, T., Koch, J. C., Becker, S., Tönges, L., Bähr, M., et al. (2016) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-016-0310-y · Cited by 158
Madinier, A., Quattromani, M. J., Sjölund, C., Ruscher, K., & Wieloch, T. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093121 · Cited by 82
Verheijden, S., Bottelbergs, A., Krysko, O., Krysko, D. V., Beckers, L., De Munter, S., Van Veldhoven, P. P., Wyns, S., Kulik, W., Nave, K.-A., et al. (2013) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2013.06.006 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandeputte, C., Taymans, J.-M., Casteels, C., Coun, F., Ni, Y., Van Laere, K., & Baekelandt, V.
- Venue
- BMC Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-08-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-92
- ISSN
- 1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003203844
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated quantitative gait analysis in animal models of movement disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2202-11-92
- The paper
- Vandeputte, C., Taymans, J.-M., Casteels, C., Coun, F., Ni, Y., Van Laere, K., & Baekelandt, V. (2010). Automated quantitative gait analysis in animal models of movement disorders. BMC Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-92
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.