The DOI matches its Crossref record.
WRKY Transcription Factors Involved in Activation of SA Biosynthesis Genes
Open accessAbstract
Background: Increased defense against a variety of pathogens in plants is achieved through activation of a mechanism known as systemic acquired resistance (SAR). The broad-spectrum resistance brought about by SAR is mediated through salicylic acid (SA). An important step in SA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis is the conversion of chorismate to isochorismate through the action of isochorismate synthase, encoded by the ICS1 gene. Also AVR PPHB SUSCEPTIBLE 3 (PBS3) plays an important role in SA metabolism, as pbs3 mutants accumulate drastically reduced levels of SA-glucoside, a putative storage form of SA. Bioinformatics analysis previously performed by us identified WRKY28 and WRKY46 as possible regulators of ICS1 and PBS3. Results: Expression studies with ICS1 promoter::β-glucuronidase (GUS) genes in Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts cotransfected with 35S::WRKY28 showed that over expression of WRKY28 resulted in a strong increase in GUS expression. Moreover, qRT-PCR analyses indicated that the endogenous ICS1 and PBS3 genes were highly expressed in protoplasts overexpressing WRKY28 or WRKY46, respectively. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indentified potential WRKY28 binding sites in the ICS1 promoter, positioned -445 and -460 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site. Mutation of these sites in protoplast transactivation assays showed that these binding sites are functionally important for activation of the ICS1 promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with haemagglutinin-epitope-tagged WRKY28 showed that the region of the ICS1 promoter containing the binding sites at -445 and -460 was highly enriched in the immunoprecipitated DNA. Conclusions: The results obtained here confirm results from our multiple microarray co-expression analyses indicating that WRKY28 and WRKY46 are transcriptional activators of ICS1 and PBS3, respectively, and support this in silico screening as a powerful tool for identifying new components of stress signaling pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Systemic Acquired Resistance: Turning Local Infection into Global Defense
Fu, Z. Q., & Dong, X. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105606 · Cited by 1,524
Stories of Salicylic Acid: A Plant Defense Hormone
Ding, P., & Ding, Y. (2020) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2020.01.004 · Cited by 743
Li, N., Han, X., Feng, D., Yuan, D., & Huang, L.-J. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20030671 · Cited by 655
Transcriptome Responses to Combinations of Stresses in Arabidopsis
Rasmussen, S., Barah, P., Suarez-Rodriguez, M. C., Bressendorff, S., Friis, P., Costantino, P., Bones, A. M., Nielsen, H. B., & Mundy, J. (2013) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.210773 · Cited by 566
Salicylic Acid: Biosynthesis and Signaling
Peng, Y., Yang, J., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-081320-092855 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- van Verk, M. C., Bol, J. F., & Linthorst, H. J.
- Venue
- BMC Plant Biology
- Published
- 2011-05-19
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-89
- ISSN
- 1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077519345
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WRKY Transcription Factors Involved in Activation of SA Biosynthesis Genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2229-11-89
- The paper
- van Verk, M. C., Bol, J. F., & Linthorst, H. J. (2011). WRKY Transcription Factors Involved in Activation of SA Biosynthesis Genes. BMC Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.