The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signaling Crosstalk between Salicylic Acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate in Plant Defense: Do We Understand What They Are Whispering?
Open accessAbstract
During their lifetime, plants encounter numerous biotic and abiotic stresses with diverse modes of attack. Phytohormones, including salicylic acid (SA), ethylene (ET), jasmonate (JA), abscisic acid (ABA), auxin (AUX), brassinosteroid (BR), gibberellic acid (GA), cytokinin (CK) and the recently identified strigolactones (SLs), orchestrate effective defense responses by activating defense gene expression. Genetic analysis of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has advanced our understanding of the function of these hormones. The SA- and ET/JA-mediated signaling pathways were thought to be the backbone of plant immune responses against biotic invaders, whereas ABA, auxin, BR, GA, CK and SL were considered to be involved in the plant immune response through modulating the SA-ET/JA signaling pathways. In general, the SA-mediated defense response plays a central role in local and systemic-acquired resistance (SAR) against biotrophic pathogens, such as Pseudomonas syringae, which colonize between the host cells by producing nutrient-absorbing structures while keeping the host alive. The ET/JA-mediated response contributes to the defense against necrotrophic pathogens, such as Botrytis cinerea, which invade and kill hosts to extract their nutrients. Increasing evidence indicates that the SA- and ET/JA-mediated defense response pathways are mutually antagonistic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 · Cited by 2,568
Cited by
Developing climate‐resilient crops: improving plant tolerance to stress combination
Rivero, R. M., Mittler, R., Blumwald, E., & Zandalinas, S. I. (2022) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.15483 · Cited by 622
Induced Systemic Resistance for Improving Plant Immunity by Beneficial Microbes
Yu, Y., Gui, Y., Li, Z., Jiang, C., Guo, J., & Niu, D. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11030386 · Cited by 570
The regulation of ethylene biosynthesis: a complex multilevel control circuitry
Pattyn, J., Vaughan‐Hirsch, J., & Van de Poel, B. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16873 · Cited by 398
Ngou, B. P. M., Jones, J. D. G., & Ding, P. (2022) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.08.012 · Cited by 384
The Role of Salicylic Acid in Plants Exposed to Heavy Metals
Sharma, A., Sidhu, G. P. S., Araniti, F., Bali, A. S., Shahzad, B., Tripathi, D. K., Brestic, M., Skalicky, M., & Landi, M. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25030540 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, N., Han, X., Feng, D., Yuan, D., & Huang, L.-J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-02-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 671
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911256426
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Signaling Crosstalk between Salicylic Acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate in Plant Defense: Do We Understand What They Are Whispering? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms20030671
- The paper
- Li, N., Han, X., Feng, D., Yuan, D., & Huang, L.-J. (2019). Signaling Crosstalk between Salicylic Acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate in Plant Defense: Do We Understand What They Are Whispering? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030671
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.