The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcript and proteomic analysis of developing white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) roots
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: White lupin (Lupinus albus L.) roots efficiently take up and accumulate (heavy) metals, adapt to phosphate deficiency by forming cluster roots, and secrete antimicrobial prenylated isoflavones during development. Genomic and proteomic approaches were applied to identify candidate genes and proteins involved in antimicrobial defense and (heavy) metal uptake and translocation. RESULTS: A cDNA library was constructed from roots of white lupin seedlings. Eight thousand clones were randomly sequenced and assembled into 2,455 unigenes, which were annotated based on homologous matches in the NCBInr protein database. A reference map of developing white lupin root proteins was established through 2-D gel electrophoresis and peptide mass fingerprinting. High quality peptide mass spectra were obtained for 170 proteins. Microsomal membrane proteins were separated by 1-D gel electrophoresis and identified by LC-MS/MS. A total of 74 proteins were putatively identified by the peptide mass fingerprinting and the LC-MS/MS methods. Genomic and proteomic analyses identified candidate genes and proteins encoding metal binding and/or transport proteins, transcription factors, ABC transporters and phenylpropanoid biosynthetic enzymes. CONCLUSION: The combined EST and protein datasets will facilitate the understanding of white lupin's response to biotic and abiotic stresses and its utility for phytoremediation. The root ESTs provided 82 perfect simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers with potential utility in breeding white lupin for enhanced agronomic traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Primer3 on the WWW for General Users and for Biologist Programmers
Rozen, S., & Skaletsky, H. (2003) · Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols · doi:10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365 · Cited by 15,013
The Pfam Protein Families Database
Bateman, A. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.276 · Cited by 14,000
The Pfam protein families database
Punta, M., Coggill, P. C., Eberhardt, R. Y., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Boursnell, C., Pang, N., Forslund, K., Ceric, G., Clements, J., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 · Cited by 3,719
The Pfam protein families database
Bateman, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh121 · Cited by 3,127
Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications
Varshney, R. K., Graner, A., & Sorrells, M. E. (2005) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.005 · Cited by 1,863
The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2011
Fujita, P. A., Rhead, B., Zweig, A. S., Hinrichs, A. S., Karolchik, D., Cline, M. S., Goldman, M., Barber, G. P., Clawson, H., Coelho, A., et al. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq963 · Cited by 1,811
Natural products and plant disease resistance
Dixon, R. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35081178 · Cited by 1,790
Self-citationTHE 1-DEOXY-D-XYLULOSE-5-PHOSPHATE PATHWAY OF ISOPRENOID BIOSYNTHESIS IN PLANTS
Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1999) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.47 · Cited by 1,406
Cited by
Effect of silver nanoparticles on Oryza sativa L. and its rhizosphere bacteria
Mirzajani, F., Askari, H., Hamzelou, S., Farzaneh, M., & Ghassempour, A. (2013) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.10.018 · Cited by 353
Blue light signalling in chloroplast movements
Banas, A. K., Aggarwal, C., Labuz, J., Sztatelman, O., & Gabrys, H. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err429 · Cited by 105
Genome editing reagent delivery in plants
Ghogare, R., Ludwig, Y., Bueno, G. M., Slamet-Loedin, I. H., & Dhingra, A. (2021) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-021-00239-w · Cited by 61
Araie, H., Sakamoto, K., Suzuki, I., & Shiraiwa, Y. (2011) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcr070 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Tian, L., Peel, G. J., Lei, Z., Aziz, N., Dai, X., He, J., Watson, B., Zhao, P. X., Sumner, L. W., & Dixon, R. A.
- Venue
- BMC Plant Biology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005889613
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 17.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcript and proteomic analysis of developing white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) roots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2229-9-1
- The paper
- Tian, L., Peel, G. J., Lei, Z., Aziz, N., Dai, X., He, J., Watson, B., Zhao, P. X., Sumner, L. W., & Dixon, R. A. (2009). Transcript and proteomic analysis of developing white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) roots. BMC Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-9-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
