The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Charlson comorbidity index is often used to control for confounding in research based on medical databases. There are few studies of the accuracy of the codes obtained from these databases. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the ICD-10 diagnostic coding in the Danish National Registry of Patients (NRP) for the 19 Charlson conditions. METHODS: Among all hospitalizations in Northern Denmark between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007 with a first-listed diagnosis of a Charlson condition in the NRP, we selected 50 hospital contacts for each condition. We reviewed discharge summaries and medical records to verify the NRP diagnoses, and computed the PPV as the proportion of confirmed diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 950 records were reviewed. The overall PPV for the 19 Charlson conditions was 98.0% (95% CI; 96.9, 98.8). The PPVs ranged from 82.0% (95% CI; 68.6%, 91.4%) for diabetes with diabetic complications to 100% (one-sided 97.5% CI; 92.9%, 100%) for congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, mild and severe liver disease, hemiplegia, renal disease, leukaemia, lymphoma, metastatic tumour, and AIDS. CONCLUSION: The PPV of NRP coding of the Charlson conditions was consistently high.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
DEYO, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 · Cited by 10,452
Validity of Dementia Diagnoses in the Danish Hospital Registers
Phung, T. K. T., Andersen, B. B., Høgh, P., Kessing, L. V., Mortensen, P. B., & Waldemar, G. (2007) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000107084 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties
Charlson, M. E., Carrozzino, D., Guidi, J., & Patierno, C. (2022) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000521288 · Cited by 1,686
Multisystem morbidity and mortality in Cushing’s syndrome: a cohort study
Dekkers, O. M., Horváth-Puhó, E., Jørgensen, J. O. L., Cannegieter, S. C., Ehrenstein, V., Vandenbroucke, J. P., Pereira, A. M., & Sørensen, H. T. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-3582 · Cited by 419
Self-citationA deep learning algorithm to predict risk of pancreatic cancer from disease trajectories
Placido, D., Yuan, B., Hjaltelin, J. X., Zheng, C., Haue, A. D., Chmura, P. J., Yuan, C., Kim, J., Umeton, R., Antell, G., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02332-5 · Cited by 349
Selmer, C., Olesen, J. B., Hansen, M. L., Lindhardsen, J., Olsen, A.-M. S., Madsen, J. C., Faber, J., Hansen, P. R., Pedersen, O. D., Torp-Pedersen, C., et al. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e7895 · Cited by 323
ADHD Medications and Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Events in Young and Middle-aged Adults
Habel, L. A., Cooper, W. O., Sox, C. M., Chan, K. A., Fireman, B. H., Arbogast, P. G., Cheetham, T. C., Quinn, V. P., Dublin, S., Boudreau, D. M., et al. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1830 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Thygesen, S. K., Christiansen, C. F., Christensen, S., Lash, T. L., & Sørensen, H. T.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2011-05-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-83
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073101005
- Cited by
- 1,195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 78.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2288-11-83
- The paper
- Thygesen, S. K., Christiansen, C. F., Christensen, S., Lash, T. L., & Sørensen, H. T. (2011). The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.