Cited by 26Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Transformations of summary statistics as input in meta-analysis for linear dose-response models on a logarithmic scale: a methodology developed within EURRECA

Open access
Souverein, Olga W, Dullemeijer, Carla, van `t Veer, Pieter, van der Voet, Hilko·2012·BMC Medical Research Methodology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To derive micronutrient recommendations in a scientifically sound way, it is important to obtain and analyse all published information on the association between micronutrient intake and biochemical proxies for micronutrient status using a systematic approach. Therefore, it is important to incorporate information from randomized controlled trials as well as observational studies as both of these provide information on the association. However, original research papers present their data in various ways. METHODS: This paper presents a methodology to obtain an estimate of the dose-response curve, assuming a bivariate normal linear model on the logarithmic scale, incorporating a range of transformations of the original reported data. RESULTS: The simulation study, conducted to validate the methodology, shows that there is no bias in the transformations. Furthermore, it is shown that when the original studies report the mean and standard deviation or the geometric mean and confidence interval the results are less variable compared to when the median with IQR or range is reported in the original study. CONCLUSIONS: The presented methodology with transformations for various reported data provides a valid way to estimate the dose-response curve for micronutrient intake and status using both randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2288-12-57

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Souverein, O. W., Dullemeijer, C., van `t Veer, P., & van der Voet, H.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Souverein, Olga W
Venue
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2012-04-25
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
57-57
ISSN
1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975229915
Cited by
26
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
dose-response curves, logarithmic scale, micronutrient intake, micronutrient status, biochemical markers
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Diet, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Models, Biological, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Linear Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Micronutrients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review