The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research?
Open accessAbstract
Background: The habitual "any other comments" general open question at the end of structured questionnaires has the potential to increase response rates, elaborate responses to closed questions, and allow respondents to identify new issues not captured in the closed questions. However, we believe that many researchers have collected such data and failed to analyse or present it. Discussion: General open questions at the end of structured questionnaires can present a problem because of their uncomfortable status of being strictly neither qualitative nor quantitative data, the consequent lack of clarity around how to analyse and report them, and the time and expertise needed to do so. We suggest that the value of these questions can be optimised if researchers start with a clear understanding of the type of data they wish to generate from such a question, and employ an appropriate strategy when designing the study. The intention can be to generate depth data or 'stories' from purposively defined groups of respondents for qualitative analysis, or to produce quantifiable data, representative of the population sampled, as a 'safety net' to identify issues which might complement the closed questions. Summary: We encourage researchers to consider developing a more strategic use of general open questions at the end of structured questionnaires. This may optimise the quality of the data and the analysis, reduce dilemmas regarding whether and how to analyse such data, and result in a more ethical approach to making best use of the data which respondents kindly provide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
Pope, C. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · Cited by 8,131
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2010) · Analyzing qualitative data · doi:10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9 · Cited by 4,800
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
What do women want? Women's experiences of infertility treatment
Malin, M., Hemminki, E., Räikkönen, O., Sihvo, S., & Perälä, M.-L. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00317-8 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Aoun, S. M., Breen, L. J., White, I., Rumbold, B., & Kellehear, A. (2018) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216318774995 · Cited by 180
Body-worn sensors in Parkinson’s disease: evaluating their acceptability to patients
Fisher, J. M., Hammerla, N. Y., Rochester, L., Andras, P., & Walker, R. W. (2016) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2015.0026 · Cited by 81
Morton, E., Sakai, K., Ashtari, A., Pleet, M., Michalak, E. E., & Woolley, J. (2023) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811221131997 · Cited by 78
Peaceful Play Yoga: Serenity and Balance for Children With Cancer and Their Parents
Thygeson, M. V., Hooke, M. C., Clapsaddle, J., Robbins, A., & Moquist, K. (2010) · Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1177/1043454210363478 · Cited by 75
A New Test of Risk Factor Relevance
CHINCO, A., HARTZMARK, S. M., & SUSSMAN, A. B. (2022) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13135 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Cathain, A., & Thomas, K. J.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2004-11-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-25
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168058604
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2288-4-25
- The paper
- O'Cathain, A., & Thomas, K. J. (2004). "Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.