The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited.The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples of use. DISCUSSION: Qualitative description is a useful qualitative method in much medical research if you keep the limitations of the approach in mind. It is especially relevant in mixed method research, in questionnaire development and in research projects aiming to gain firsthand knowledge of patients', relatives' or professionals' experiences with a particular topic. Another great advantage of the method is that it is suitable if time or resources are limited. SUMMARY: As a consequence of the growth in qualitative research in the health sciences, researchers sometimes feel obliged to designate their work as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography or a narrative study when in fact it is not. Qualitative description might be a useful alternative approach to consider.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
Interpretive description: A noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge
Thorne, S., Kirkham, S. R., & MacDonald-Emes, J. (1997) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199704)20:2<169::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-i · Cited by 1,720
Sullivan-Bolyai, S., Bova, C., & Harper, D. (2005) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005 · Cited by 652
Enhancing Rigor in Qualitative Description
Milne, J., & Oberle, K. (2005) · Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing · doi:10.1097/00152192-200511000-00014 · Cited by 435
Description versus Interpretation: Competing Alternative Strategies for Qualitative Research
Giorgi, A. (1992) · Journal of Phenomenological Psychology · doi:10.1163/156916292x00090 · Cited by 222
Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Jensen, A. B., & Søndergaard, J. (2008) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/1472-684x-7-1 · Cited by 102
Self-citationWeibull, A. S., Olesen, F., & Neergaard, M. A. (2008) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/1472-684x-7-15 · Cited by 30
Self-citation(2000) · doi:10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g
Cited by
Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017) · Global Qualitative Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/2333393617742282 · Cited by 2,475
Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research
Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016) · HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/1937586715614171 · Cited by 1,423
Hong, Q. N., Gonzalez‐Reyes, A., & Pluye, P. (2018) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12884 · Cited by 1,107
Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology
Kahlke, R. M. (2014) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940691401300119 · Cited by 630
Stephenson, J., Patel, D., Barrett, G., Howden, B., Copas, A., Ojukwu, O., Pandya, P., & Shawe, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103085 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2009-07-16
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-52
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098752671
- Cited by
- 2,072
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 77.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
- The paper
- Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
