Cited by 211Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareReproductive Health and ContraceptionPregnancy and Medication Impact

How Do Women Prepare for Pregnancy? Preconception Experiences of Women Attending Antenatal Services and Views of Health Professionals

Open access
Stephenson, Judith, Patel, Dilisha, Barrett, Geraldine, Howden, Beth, Copas, Andrew, Ojukwu, Obiamaka, Pandya, Pranav, Shawe, Jill·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

MAIN OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which women plan and prepare for pregnancy. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire survey of pregnant women attending three maternity services in London about knowledge and uptake of preconception care; including a robust measure of pregnancy planning, and phone interviews with a range of health care professionals. MAIN RESULTS: We recruited 1173/1288 (90%) women, median age of 32 years. 73% had clearly planned their pregnancy, 24% were ambivalent and only 3% of pregnancies were unplanned. 51% of all women and 63% of those with a planned pregnancy took folic acid before pregnancy. 21% of all women reported smoking and 61% reported drinking alcohol in the 3 months before pregnancy; 48% of smokers and 41% of drinkers reduced or stopped before pregnancy. The 51% of all women who reported advice from a health professional before becoming pregnant were more likely to adopt healthier behaviours before pregnancy [adjusted odds ratios for greatest health professional input compared with none were 2.34 (95% confidence interval 1.54-3.54) for taking folic acid and 2.18 (95% CI 1.42-3.36) for adopting a healthier diet before pregnancy]. Interviews with 20 health professionals indicated low awareness of preconception health issues, missed opportunities and confusion about responsibility for delivery of preconception care. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FINDINGS: Despite a high level of pregnancy planning, awareness of preconception health among women and health professionals is low, and responsibility for providing preconception care is unclear. However, many women are motivated to adopt healthier behaviours in the preconception period, as indicated by halving of reported smoking rates in this study. The link between health professional input and healthy behaviour change before pregnancy is a new finding that should invigorate strategies to improve awareness and uptake of pre-pregnancy health care, and bring wider benefits for public health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0103085

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Johnson K, Posner S, Biermann J, Cordero J, Atrash H, et al (2006) Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 55: 1– 23. 16617292

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stephenson, J., Patel, D., Barrett, G., Howden, B., Copas, A., Ojukwu, O., Pandya, P., & Shawe, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Stephenson, Judith
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-07-24
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
e103085
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998100168
Cited by
210
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8
FWCI
19.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0513-10099)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K006584/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
preconception care, pregnancy planning, prenatal care, folic acid supplementation, smoking cessation, alcohol consumption, provider recommendation, health professional awareness, missed opportunities, maternal health behavior, pregnant women
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Occupations, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Perception, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Preconception Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review