The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary care incidence and treatment of four neuropathic pain conditions: A descriptive study, 2002–2005
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Between 1992 and 2001 the UK general practice incidence of post-herpetic neuralgia and trigeminal neuralgia declined, whilst the incidence of painful diabetic neuropathy increased. The most common first line treatments were compound analgesics. As therapeutic options have subsequently changed, this study presents updated data on incidence and prescribing patterns in neuropathic pain. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of the epidemiology and prescription treatment at diagnosis of incident post-herpetic neuralgia (n = 1,923); trigeminal neuralgia (1,862); phantom limb pain (57) and painful diabetic neuropathy (1,444) using computerised UK general practice records (THIN): May 2002 to July 2005. RESULTS: Primary care incidences per 100,000 person years observation of 28 (95% confidence interval (CI) 27-30) for post-herpetic neuralgia, 27 (95%CI 26-29) for trigeminal neuralgia, 0.8 (95%CI 0.6-1.1) for phantom limb pain and 21 (95%CI 20-22) for painful diabetic neuropathy are reported. The most common initial treatments were tricyclic antidepressants (post-herpetic neuralgia) or antiepileptics (trigeminal neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy) and opioid analgesics (phantom limb pain). The mean number of changes before a stable drug regimen was 1.2 to 1.5 for trigeminal neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia, and 2.4 for phantom limb pain. CONCLUSION: The incidence of phantom limb pain and post-herpetic neuralgia are decreasing whilst painful diabetic neuropathy plateaued and trigeminal neuralgia remained constant. Despite more frequent use of antidepressants and antiepileptics for first line treatment, as opposed to conventional non-opioid analgesics, changes to therapy are common before a stable regimen is reached.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MacDonald, B. K. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.4.665 · Cited by 858
Cited by
NeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment
Haanpää, M., Attal, N., Backonja, M., Baron, R., Bennett, M., Bouhassira, D., Cruccu, G., Hansson, P., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Iannetti, G. D., et al. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.031 · Cited by 1,060
for the European Depression in Diabetes (EDID) Research Consortium, Nouwen, A., Winkley, K., Twisk, J., Lloyd, C. E., Peyrot, M., Ismail, K., & Pouwer, F. (2010) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1874-x · Cited by 756
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults
Wiffen, P. J., Derry, S., Bell, R. F., Rice, A. S., Tölle, T. R., Phillips, T., & Moore, R. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007938.pub4 · Cited by 561
Incidence of facial pain in the general population
Koopman, J. S. H. A., Dieleman, J. P., Huygen, F. J., de Mos, M., Martin, C. G. M., & Sturkenboom, M. C. J. M. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.023 · Cited by 489
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults
Moore, R. A., Wiffen, P. J., Derry, S., & Rice, A. S. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007938.pub3 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, G. C., Carroll, D., & McQuay, H. J.
- Venue
- BMC Family Practice
- Published
- 2008-05-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-26
- ISSN
- 1471-2296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098753385
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary care incidence and treatment of four neuropathic pain conditions: A descriptive study, 2002–2005. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2296-9-26
- The paper
- Hall, G. C., Carroll, D., & McQuay, H. J. (2008). Primary care incidence and treatment of four neuropathic pain conditions: A descriptive study, 2002–2005. BMC Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-9-26
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.