The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combined use of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer
Abstract
Background: The detection of serum tumor marker becomes a common method for screening tumors. However, this method has not been widely used for routine gastric cancer screening. In this study we aimed to determine whether the combined use of tumor markers may increase the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Methods: Serum AFP, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 levels were measured in 149 patients with gastric cancer, 111 patients with benign gastric diseases and 124 healthy people, who visited the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from May 2011 to May 2012. Statistical analysis including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), and logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of these markers on gastric cancer. Results: Serum levels of CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 in gastric cancer group were higher than that in the benign gastric disease group and the healthy control group (P <0.005). The sensitivity of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer was 4.7-20.8% individually, and increased to 40.3% in combination. By using optimal cut-off value, the sensitivity of CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 for the diagnosis of gastric cancer was improved. Especially, the sensitivity of CEA increased to 58.4% and the sensitivity of combined use of four markers increased to 69.1%. The age and gender had no effects on the diagnostic value of these markers. Conclusions: The determination and application of optimal cut-off values based on ROC curve and logistic regression analysis could improve the diagnosis of gastric cancer based on common tumor markers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The current clinical serum based protein biomarkers for cancers are often unsatisfactory and lack specificity [2].”
From Bioinformatic Interrogation of 5p-arm and 3p-arm Specific miRNA Expression Using TCGA Datasets (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2011) · Hepatogastroenterology · doi:10.5754/hge11753 · Cited by 2,435
(2012) · Hepatogastroenterology · doi:10.5754/hge11801 · Cited by 802
Ychou, M., Duffour, J., Kramar, A., Gourgou, S., & Grenier, J. (2000) · Disease Markers · doi:10.1155/2000/595492 · Cited by 124
Correlation between serum CA724 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population
Chen, X., Zhang, W., Yang, K., Wang, L., Liu, J., Wang, L., Hu, J.-K., Zhang, B., Chen, Z., Chen, J., et al. (2012) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-012-1774-x · Cited by 121
Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Jackson, C., Cunningham, D., & Oliveira, J. (2009) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp122 · Cited by 119
Duraker, N., & Çeli̇k, A. N. (2001) · Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1002/jso.1044 · Cited by 82
Lai, I., Lee, W.-J., Huang, M., & Lin, H.-H. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 81
Serological assessment of gastric mucosal atrophy in gastric cancer
Bornschein, J., Selgrad, M., Wex, T., Kuester, D., & Malfertheiner, P. (2012) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/1471-230x-12-10 · Cited by 80
The use of tumor markers as predictors of prognosis in gastric cancer.
Mihmanlı, M., Dilege, E., Demir, U., Coskun, H., Eroglu, T., & Uysalol, M. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 69
Wobbes, T., Thomas, C. M. G., Segers, M. F., & Nagengast, F. M. (1992) · Cancer · Cited by 57
Cited by
Bioinformatic Interrogation of 5p-arm and 3p-arm Specific miRNA Expression Using TCGA Datasets
Kuo, W.-T., Su, M.-W., Lee, Y., Chen, C.-H., Wu, C.-W., Fang, W.-L., Huang, K.-H., & Lin, W.-C. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm4091798 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- He, C.-Z., Zhang, K.-H., Li, Q., Liu, X.-H., Hong, Y., & Lv, N.-H.
- Venue
- BMC Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2013-05-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1471-230X
- PMC
- PMC3655895
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 15
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined use of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-230x-13-87
- The paper
- He, C.-Z., Zhang, K.-H., Li, Q., Liu, X.-H., Hong, Y., & Lv, N.-H. (2013). Combined use of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230x-13-87
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.