The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increased risk of traffic accidents in subjects with latent toxoplasmosis: a retrospective case-control study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The parasite Toxoplasma gondii infects 30-60% of humans worldwide. Latent toxoplasmosis, i.e., the life-long presence of Toxoplasma cysts in neural and muscular tissues, leads to prolongation of reaction times in infected subjects. It is not know, however, whether the changes observed in laboratory influence the performance of subjects in real-life situations. METHODS: The seroprevalence of latent toxoplasmosis in subjects involved in traffic accidents (N=146) and in the general population living in the same area (N=446) was compared by a Mantel-Haenszel test for age-stratified data. Correlation between relative risk of traffic accident and a level of anti-Toxoplasma antibody titre was evaluated with the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. RESULTS: A higher seroprevalence was found in the traffic accident set than in the general population (Chi2MH=21.45, p<0.0001). The value of the odds ratio (OR) suggests that subjects with latent toxoplasmosis had a 2.65 (C.I.95= 1.764.01) times higher risk of an accident than the toxoplasmosis-negative subjects. The OR significantly increased with level of anti-Toxoplasma antibody titre (p<0.0001), being low (OR=1.86, C.I.95=1.14-3.03) for the 99 subjects with low antibody titres (8 and 16), higher (OR=4.78, C.I.95=2.39-9.59) for the 37 subjects with moderate titres (32 and 64), and very high (OR=16.03, C.I.95=1.89-135.66) for the 6 subjects with titres higher than 64. CONCLUSION: The subjects with latent toxoplasmosis have significantly increased risk of traffic accidents than the noninfected subjects. Relative risk of traffic accidents decreases with the duration of infection. These results suggest that 'asymptomatic' acquired toxoplasmosis might in fact represent a serious and highly underestimated public health as well as economic problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The socioeconomic burden of parasitic zoonoses: Global trends
Torgerson, P. R., & Macpherson, C. N. L. (2011) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.017 · Cited by 404
Are some cases of psychosis caused by microbial agents? A review of the evidence
Yolken, R. H., & Torrey, E. F. (2008) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.5 · Cited by 329
Arling, T. A., Yolken, R. H., Lapidus, M., Langenberg, P., Dickerson, F. B., Zimmerman, S. A., Balis, T., Cabassa, J. A., Scrandis, D. A., Tonelli, L. H., et al. (2009) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181c29a23 · Cited by 213
Cook, T. B., Brenner, L. A., Cloninger, C. R., Langenberg, P., Igbide, A., Giegling, I., Hartmann, A. M., Konte, B., Friedl, M., Brundin, L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.019 · Cited by 122
Peng, X., Brenner, L. A., Mathai, A. J., Cook, T. B., Fuchs, D., Postolache, N., Groer, M. W., Pandey, J. P., Mohyuddin, F., Giegling, I., et al. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.045 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Flegr, J., Havlícek, J., Kodym, P., Malý, M., & Smahel, Z.
- Venue
- BMC Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2002-07-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1471-2334 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1481332551
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased risk of traffic accidents in subjects with latent toxoplasmosis: a retrospective case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2334-2-11
- The paper
- Flegr, J., Havlícek, J., Kodym, P., Malý, M., & Smahel, Z. (2002). Increased risk of traffic accidents in subjects with latent toxoplasmosis: a retrospective case-control study. BMC Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-2-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.