The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of population based epidemiological studies in Myasthenia Gravis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The aim was to collate all myasthenia gravis (MG) epidemiological studies including AChR MG and MuSK MG specific studies. To synthesize data on incidence rate (IR), prevalence rate (PR) and mortality rate (MR) of the condition and investigate the influence of environmental and technical factors on any trends or variation observed. METHODS: Studies were identified using multiple sources and meta-analysis performed to calculate pooled estimates for IR, PR and MR. RESULTS: 55 studies performed between 1950 and 2007 were included, representing 1.7 billion population-years. For All MG estimated pooled IR (eIR): 5.3 per million person-years (C.I.:4.4, 6.1), range: 1.7 to 21.3; estimated pooled PR: 77.7 per million persons (C.I.:64.0, 94.3), range 15 to 179; MR range 0.1 to 0.9 per millions person-years. AChR MG eIR: 7.3 (C.I.:5.5, 7.8), range: 4.3 to 18.0; MuSK MG IR range: 0.1 to 0.32. However marked variation persisted between populations studied with similar methodology and in similar areas. CONCLUSIONS: We report marked variation in observed frequencies of MG. We show evidence of increasing frequency of MG with year of study and improved study quality. This probably reflects improved case ascertainment. But other factors must also influence disease onset resulting in the observed variation in IR across geographically and genetically similar populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
MacDonald, B. K. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.4.665 · Cited by 858
Cited by
The different roles of the thymus in the pathogenesis of the various myasthenia gravis subtypes
Marx, A., Pfister, F., Schalke, B., Saruhan-Direskeneli, G., Melms, A., & Ströbel, P. (2013) · Autoimmunity Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2013.03.007 · Cited by 351
Targeting the Neonatal Fc Receptor in Autoimmune Diseases: Pipeline and Progress
Gjølberg, T. T., Mester, S., Calamera, G., Telstad, J. S., Sandlie, I., & Andersen, J. T. (2025) · BioDrugs · doi:10.1007/s40259-025-00708-2 · Cited by 20
High-resolution esophageal manometry in myasthenia gravis
Torres-Barrera, G., Herrera-Quiñones, G., Scharrer, S. I., Benavides-Salgado, D. E., Maldonado-Garza, H. J., & Achem, S. R. (2020) · ACG Case Reports Journal · doi:10.14309/crj.0000000000000340 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Carr, A. S., Cardwell, C. R., McCarron, P. O., & McConville, J.
- Venue
- BMC Neurology
- Published
- 2010-06-18
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-46
- ISSN
- 1471-2377 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072475795
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of population based epidemiological studies in Myasthenia Gravis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2377-10-46
- The paper
- Carr, A. S., Cardwell, C. R., McCarron, P. O., & McConville, J. (2010). A systematic review of population based epidemiological studies in Myasthenia Gravis. BMC Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-10-46
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.