Cited by 71Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsReproductive Health and Contraception

Factors associated with health facility childbirth in districts of Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia: a population based survey

Open access
Ng’anjo Phiri, Selia, Kiserud, Torvid, Kvåle, Gunnar, Byskov, Jens, Evjen-Olsen, Bjørg, Michelo, Charles, Echoka, Elizabeth, Fylkesnes, Knut·2014·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality continues to be a heavy burden in low and middle income countries where half of all deliveries take place in homes without skilled attendance. The study aimed to investigate the underlying and proximate determinants of health facility childbirth in rural and urban areas of three districts in Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia. METHODS: A population-based survey was conducted in 2007 as part of the 'REsponse to ACcountable priority setting for Trust in health systems' (REACT) project. Stratified random cluster sampling was used and the data included information on place of delivery and factors that might influence health care seeking behaviour. A total of 1800 women who had childbirth in the previous five years were analysed. The distal and proximate conceptual framework for analysing determinants of maternal mortality was modified for studying factors associated with place of delivery. Socioeconomic position was measured by employing a construct of educational attainment and wealth index. All analyses were stratified by district and urban-rural residence. RESULTS: There were substantial inter-district differences in proportion of health facility childbirth. Facility childbirth was 15, 70 and 37% in the rural areas of Malindi, Mbarali and Kapiri Mposhi respectively, and 57, 75 and 77% in the urban areas of the districts respectively. However, striking socio-economic inequities were revealed regardless of district. Furthermore, there were indications that repeated exposure to ANC services and HIV related counselling and testing were positively associated with health facility deliveries. Perceived distance was negatively associated with facility childbirth in rural areas of Malindi and urban areas of Kapiri Mposhi. CONCLUSION: Strong socio-economic inequities in the likelihood of facility childbirths were revealed in all the districts added to geographic inequities in two of the three districts. This strongly suggests an urgent need to strengthen services targeting disadvantaged and remote populations. The finding of a positive association between HIV counselling/testing and odds in favor of giving birth at a health facility suggests potential positive effects can be achieved by strengthening integrated approaches in maternal health service delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2393-14-219

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng’anjo Phiri, S., Kiserud, T., Kvåle, G., Byskov, J., Evjen-Olsen, B., Michelo, C., Echoka, E., & Fylkesnes, K.
Affiliations
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Zambia (ZM)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2014-07-04
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
219-219
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108676195
Cited by
71
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
facility-based childbirth, place of delivery, health facility utilization, obstetric care, health-seeking behavior, socioeconomic inequities, urban-rural disparities, prenatal care, HIV counseling and testing, maternal mortality, Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Health Facilities, Health Services Accessibility, Home Childbirth, Humans, Kenya, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Quality of Health Care, Rural Population, Social Class, Tanzania, Urban Population, Zambia, Marital Status, Health Care Surveys, Trust, Healthcare Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review