Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: a case–control study

Heaman, Maureen I, Moffatt, Michael, Elliott, Lawrence, Sword, Wendy, Helewa, Michael E, Morris, Heather, Gregory, Patricia, Tjaden, Lynda, Cook, Catherine·2014·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-227
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2393-14-227

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. The Chief Public Health Officer's report on the state of public health in Canada: Growing up well: Priorities for a Healthy Future. 2009, Retrieved from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cphorsphc-respcacsp/2009/fr-rc/pdf/cphorsphc-respcacsp-eng.pdf on October 24, 2011
  2. Canada H: Health Family Centred Maternity and Newborn Care: National Guidelines. 2000, Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services
  3. Heaman MI, Green CG, Newburn-Cook CV, Elliott LJ, Helewa ME: Social inequalities in use of prenatal care in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007, 29 (10): 806-816. · DOI
  4. Janz NK, Champion VL, Strecher VJ: The health belief model. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Edited by: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. 2002, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 45-66. 3
  5. Stewart MJ: Access to health care for economically disadvantaged Canadians: a model. Can J Public Health. 1990, 81 (6): 450-455.
  6. Erci B: Barriers to utilization of prenatal care services in Turkey. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003, 35 (3): 269-273. · DOI
  7. Johnson AA, El Khorazaty MN, Hatcher BJ, Wingrove BK, Milligan R, Harris C, Richards L: Determinants of late prenatal care initiation by African American women in Washington. DC Matern Child Health J. 2003, 7 (3): 103-114. · DOI
  8. Melnikow J, Alemagno S: Adequacy of prenatal care among inner-city women. J Fam Pract. 1993, 37 (6): 575-582.
  9. Braveman P, Marchi K, Egerter S, Pearl M, Neuhaus J: Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: the importance of prepregnancy factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 95 (6 Pt.1): 874-880.
  10. Cook CA, Selig KL, Wedge BJ, Gohn-Baube EA: Access barriers and the use of prenatal care by low-income, inner-city women. Soc Work. 1999, 44 (2): 129-139. · DOI
  11. Sable MR, Wilkinson DS: Pregnancy intentions, pregnancy attitudes, and the use of prenatal care in Missouri. Matern Child Health J. 1998, 2 (3): 155-165. · DOI
  12. Lia-Hoagberg B, Rode P, Skovholt CJ, Oberg CN, Berg C, Mullett S, Choi T: Barriers and motivators to prenatal care among low-income women. Soc Sci Med. 1990, 30 (4): 487-495. · DOI
  13. Sunil TS, Spears WD, Hook L, Castillo J, Torres C: Initiation of and barriers to prenatal care use among low-income women in San Antonio Texas. Matern Child Health J. 2008, 14 (1): 133-140. · DOI
  14. Friedman SH, Heneghan A, Rosenthal M: Characteristics of women who do not seek prenatal care and implications for prevention. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009, 38 (2): 174-181. · DOI
  15. Mikhail BI: Perceived impediments to prenatal care among low-income women. West J Nurs Res. 1999, 21 (3): 335-350. · DOI
  16. Teagle SE, Brindis CD: Perceptions of motivators and barriers to public prenatal care among first-time and follow-up adolescent patients and their providers. Matern Child Health J. 1998, 2 (1): 15-24. · DOI
  17. Beckmann CA, Buford TA, Witt JB: Perceived barriers to prenatal care services. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2000, 25 (1): 43-46. · DOI
  18. Milligan R, Wingrove BK, Richards L, Rodan M, Monroe-Lord L, Jackson V, Hatcher B, Harris C, Henderson C, Johnson AA: Perceptions about prenatal care: views of urban vulnerable groups. BMC Public Health. 2002, 2 (25): 1-9.
  19. York R, Williams P, Munro BH: Maternal factors that influence inadequate prenatal-care. Public Health Nurs. 1993, 10 (4): 241-244. · DOI
  20. Poland ML, Ager JW, Olson JM: Barriers to receiving adequate prenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987, 157 (2): 297-303. · DOI
  21. Nothnagle M, Marchi K, Egerter S, Braveman P: Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California. Matern Child Health J. 2000, 4 (4): 251-259. · DOI
  22. Meikle SF, Orleans M, Leff M, Shain R, Gibbs RS: Women's reasons for not seeking prenatal care: racial and ethnic factors. Birth. 1995, 22 (2): 81-86. · DOI
  23. Katz SJ, Armstrong RW, LoGerfo JP: The adequacy of prenatal care and incidence of low birthweight among the poor in Washington State and British Columbia. Am J Public Health. 1994, 84 (6): 986-991. · DOI
  24. Phillippi JC: Women's perceptions of access to prenatal care in the United States: a literature review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009, 54 (3): 219-225. · DOI
  25. Mikhail B: Prenatal care utilization among low-income African American women. J Community Health Nurs. 2000, 17 (4): 235-246. · DOI
  26. Fuller CA, Gallagher R: What's happening: perceived benefits and barriers of prenatal care in low income women. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1999, 11 (2): 527-532. · DOI
  27. Alexander GR, Cornely DA: Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med. 1987, 3 (5): 243-253. · DOI
  28. Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M: Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices. Public Health Rep. 1996, 111 (5): 408-418.
  29. Kotelchuck M: An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal-care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal-care utilization index. Am J Public Health. 1994, 84 (9): 1414-1420. · DOI
  30. Delvaux T, Buekens P, Godin I, Boutsen M: Barriers to prenatal care in Europe. Am J Prev Med. 2001, 21 (1): 52-59. · DOI
  31. Johnson AA, Hatcher BJ, El-Khorazaty MN, Milligan RA, Bhaskar B, Rodan MF, Richards L, Wingrove BK, Laryea HA: Determinants of inadequate prenatal care utilization by African American women. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007, 18 (3): 620-636. · DOI
  32. Correa A, Stewart WF, Yeh HC, Santos-Burgoa C: Exposure measurement in case–control studies: reported methods and recommendations. Epidemiol Rev. 1994, 16 (1): 18-32. · DOI
  33. Frey J, Oishi S: How to conduct interviews by telephone and in person. 1995, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  34. Feijen-de Jong EI, Jansen DE, Baarveld F, van der Schans CP, Schellevis FG, Reijneveld SA: Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2011, 22 (6): 904-913. · DOI
  35. Heaman MI, Gupton AL, Moffatt ME: Prevalence and predictors of inadequate prenatal care: a comparison of aboriginal and non-aboriginal women in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005, 27 (3): 237-246. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Aboriginal Health Initiative Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada: Health professionals working with First Nations, Inuit and Métis consensus guideline. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2013, 35 (6): S1-S50. · DOI
  37. O'Donnell V, Wallace S: Women in Canada: A gender-based statistical report. First Nations, Métis and Inuit women. 2011, Ottawa: Statistics Canada: Social and Aboriginal Statistics Division, 3-49. 89-503-X
  38. Smylie J: A guide for health professionals working with aboriginal peoples: the sociocultural context of aboriginal peoples in Canada [SOGC Policy Statement]. JOGC. 2000, 22 (12): 1070-1081.
  39. Sokoloski EH: Canadian First Nations women's beliefs about pregnancy and prenatal care. Can J Nurs Res. 1995, 27 (1): 89-100.
  40. Long CR, Curry MA: Living in two worlds: native American women and prenatal care. Health Care Women Int. 1998, 19 (3): 205-215. · DOI
  41. Downe S, Finlayson K, Walsh D, Lavender T: Weighing up and balancing out': a meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries. BJOG. 2009, 116 (4): 518-529. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Grady MA, Bloom KC: Pregnancy outcomes of adolescents enrolled in a Centering Pregnancy program. Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health. 2004, 49 (5): 412-420. · DOI
  43. Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, Magriples U, Massey Z, Reynolds H, Rising SS: Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 110 (2 Pt 1): 330-339. · DOI
  44. Baldwin KA: Comparison of selected outcomes of centering pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006, 51 (4): 266-272. · DOI
  45. Kennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R, Hill S, Jolivet RR, Cooper BA, Rising SS: A randomized clinical trial of group prenatal care in two military settings. Mil Med. 2011, 176 (10): 1169-1177. · DOI
  46. Bloom KC, Bednarzyk MS, Devitt DL, Renault RA, Teaman V, Van Loock DM: Barriers to prenatal care for homeless pregnant women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004, 33 (4): 428-435. · DOI
  47. Daniels P, Noe GF, Mayberry R: Barriers to prenatal care among Black women of low socioeconomic status. Am J Health Behav. 2006, 30 (2): 188-198. · DOI
  48. Kalmuss D, Fennelly K: Barriers to prenatal care among low-income women in New York City. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990, 22 (5): 215-218. 231 · DOI
  49. Novick G: Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009, 54 (3): 226-237. · DOI
  50. Nepal V, Banerjee D, Perry M: Prenatal care barriers in an inner-city neighborhood in Houston, Texas. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health. 2011, 2 (1): 33-36. · DOI
  51. Lee SH, Grubbs LM: Pregnant teenagers' reasons for seeking or delaying prenatal care. Clin Nurs Res. 1995, 4 (1): 38-49. · DOI
  52. Lu MC, Kotelchuck M, Hogan VK, Johnson K, Reyes C: Innovative strategies to reduce disparities in the quality of prenatal care in underresourced settings. Med Care Res Rev. 2010, 67 (5 Suppl): 198S-230S. · DOI

Cited by

See all 78

Metadata

Authors
Heaman, M. I., Moffatt, M., Elliott, L., Sword, W., Helewa, M. E., Morris, H., Gregory, P., Tjaden, L., & Cook, C.
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-07-15
Volume
14
Issue
1
ISSN
1471-2393
DOI
10.1186/1471-2393-14-227
Cited by
78
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.