The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: I. Application of regional cancer survival model to estimate cancer mortality distribution by site
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Global Burden of Disease 2000 (GBD 2000) study starts from an analysis of the overall mortality envelope in order to ensure that the cause-specific estimates add to the total all cause mortality by age and sex. For regions where information on the distribution of cancer deaths is not available, a site-specific survival model was developed to estimate the distribution of cancer deaths by site. METHODS: An age-period-cohort model of cancer survival was developed based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). The model was further adjusted for the level of economic development in each region. Combined with the available incidence data, cancer death distributions were estimated and the model estimates were validated against vital registration data from regions other than the United States. RESULTS: Comparison with cancer mortality distribution from vital registration confirmed the validity of this approach. The model also yielded the cancer mortality distribution which is consistent with the estimates based on regional cancer registries. There was a significant variation in relative interval survival across regions, in particular for cancers of bladder, breast, melanoma of the skin, prostate and haematological malignancies. Moderate variations were observed among cancers of colon, rectum, and uterus. Cancers with very poor prognosis such as liver, lung, and pancreas cancers showed very small variations across the regions. CONCLUSIONS: The survival model presented here offers a new approach to the calculation of the distribution of deaths for areas where mortality data are either scarce or unavailable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study
Murray, C. J., & Lopez, A. D. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07493-4 · Cited by 4,043 · cited 1×
“It is suggested that model-based estimates of cancer mortality in the previous GBD 1990 study did not reflect the actual profile of cancer recorded at the regional registries, in particular of site-specific cancer mortality distribution [3,5,37].”
ResultSelf-citation
Cited by
Danaei, G., Vander Hoorn, S., Lopez, A. D., Murray, C. J., & Ezzati, M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67725-2 · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationThe Global Breast Cancer Burden: Variations in Epidemiology and Survival
Hortobagyi, G. N., de la Garza Salazar, J., Pritchard, K., Amadori, D., Haidinger, R., Hudis, C. A., Khaled, H., Liu, M.-C., Martin, M., Namer, M., et al. (2005) · Clinical Breast Cancer · doi:10.3816/cbc.2005.n.043 · Cited by 586
Spectrum of Breast Cancer in Asian Women
Agarwal, G., Pradeep, P. V., Aggarwal, V., Yip, C., & Cheung, P. S. Y. (2007) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-005-0585-9 · Cited by 443
Role of smoking in global and regional cancer epidemiology: Current patterns and data needs
Ezzati, M., Henley, S. J., Lopez, A. D., & Thun, M. J. (2005) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.21100 · Cited by 314
Self-citationAnsari, K. K., & Jha, A. (2022) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.28875 · Cited by 308
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathers, C. D., Shibuya, K., Boschi-Pinto, C., Lopez, A. D., & Murray, C. J.
- Venue
- BMC Cancer
- Published
- 2002-12-26
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-36
- ISSN
- 1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129751281
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: I. Application of regional cancer survival model to estimate cancer mortality distribution by site. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2407-2-36
- The paper
- Mathers, C. D., Shibuya, K., Boschi-Pinto, C., Lopez, A. D., & Murray, C. J. (2002). Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: I. Application of regional cancer survival model to estimate cancer mortality distribution by site. BMC Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-2-36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.