Cited by 25Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis in children in Bangui, Central African Republic

Open access
Fanny, Minime-Lingoupou, Beyam, Narcisse, Gody, Jean Chrusostome, Zandanga, G, Yango, F, Manirakiza, Alexandre, Rigouts, Leen, Pierre-Audigier, Catherine +2 more·2012·BMC Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in developing countries. One of the main difficulties is obtaining adequate specimens for bacteriological confirmation of the disease in children.The aim of this study is to evaluate the adequacy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for the diagnosis of TB. METHODS: In a prospective study conducted at the paediatric hospital in Bangui in 2007-2009, we used fine-needle aspiration to obtain samples for diagnosis of TB from 131 children aged 0-17 years with persistent lymphadenitis. RESULTS: Fine-needle aspiration provided samples that could be used for bacteriological confirmation of TB. Ziehl-Neelsen staining for acid-fast bacilli was positive in 42.7% of samples, and culture identified TB in 67.2% of cases. Of 75 samples that were stain-negative, 49 (65.3%) were culture-positive, while 12 stain-positive samples remained culture-negative. Ten of the 12 stain-positive, culture-negative samples were from patients who had received previous antimicrobial therapy. With regard to phenotypic drug susceptibility, 81/88 strains (91.1%) were fully susceptible to isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and streptomycin, six (6.8%) were resistant to one drug, and one multidrug-resistant strain was found. CONCLUSIONS: Fine-needle aspiration is simple, cost-effective and non-invasive and can be performed by trained staff. Combined with rapid molecular diagnostic tests, fine-needle aspirates could improve the diagnosis of TB and provide valuable information for appropriate treatment and drug resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2431-12-191

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extrapulmonary tuberculosis, including TL, is more common in immunocompromised patients, such as those with HIV infection; in these patients, the disease is almost always secondary to reactivation of a latent tuberculosis infection.

    “Extrapulmonary tuberculosis, including TL, is more common in immunocompromised patients, such as those with HIV infection; in these patients, the disease is almost always secondary to reactivation of a latent tuberculosis infection.12”

    From Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Tuberculous Lymphadenitis in a Tuberculosis Low-Burden Country (2015) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Background (page unavailable) says extrapulmonary TB is common in children with TB, reports HIV co-infection among children treated for TB in Bangui, and describes lymphadenitis as common among extrapulmonary cases. It does not establish that extrapulmonary TB is more common in immunocompromised patients than in others. Neither the Background nor the other retrieved passages address the claim that disease in these patients is almost always due to reactivation of latent infection. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fanny, M.-L., Beyam, N., Gody, J. C., Zandanga, G., Yango, F., Manirakiza, A., Rigouts, L., Pierre-Audigier, C., Gicquel, B., & Bobossi, G.
Affiliations
  • Institut Pasteur de Bangui (CF)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
Venue
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2012-12
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
191-191
ISSN
1471-2431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034582455
Cited by
25
References
16
Citations by year
2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
tuberculous lymphadenitis, fine-needle aspiration, pediatric tuberculosis, bacteriological confirmation, acid-fast staining, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture, multidrug resistance, drug sensitivity, antimicrobial therapy, Bangui
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Antitubercular Agents, Axilla, Central African Republic, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Lymph Nodes, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Neck, Prospective Studies, Tuberculosis, Lymph Node, Biopsy, Fine-Needle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review