CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 214Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characteristics of highly impaired children with severe chronic pain: a 5-year retrospective study on 2249 pediatric pain patients

Open access
Zernikow, Boris, Wager, Julia, Hechler, Tanja, Hasan, Carola, Rohr, Uta, Dobe, Michael, Meyer, Adrian, Hübner-Möhler, Bettina, Wamsler, Christine, Blankenburg, Markus·2012·BMC Pediatrics
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-54PMC PMC3404028
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of pain as a recurrent symptom in children is known to be high, but little is known about children with high impairment from chronic pain seeking specialized treatment. The purpose of this study was the precise description of children with high impairment from chronic pain referred to the German Paediatric Pain Centre over a 5-year period. METHODS: Demographic variables, pain characteristics and psychometric measures were assessed at the first evaluation. Subgroup analysis for sex, age and pain location was conducted and multivariate logistic regression applied to identify parameters associated with extremely high impairment. RESULTS: The retrospective study consisted of 2249 children assessed at the first evaluation. Tension type headache (48%), migraine (43%) and functional abdominal pain (11%) were the most common diagnoses with a high rate of co-occurrence; 18% had some form of musculoskeletal pain disease. Irrespective of pain location, chronic pain disorder with somatic and psychological factors was diagnosed frequently (43%). 55% of the children suffered from more than one distinct pain diagnosis. Clinically significant depression and general anxiety scores were expressed by 24% and 19% of the patients, respectively. Girls over the age of 13 were more likely to seek tertiary treatment compared to boys. Nearly half of children suffered from daily or constant pain with a mean pain value of 6/10. Extremely high pain-related impairment, operationalized as a comprehensive measure of pain duration, frequency, intensity, pain-related school absence and disability, was associated with older age, multiple locations of pain, increased depression and prior hospital stays. 43% of the children taking analgesics had no indication for pharmacological treatment. CONCLUSION: Children with chronic pain are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge as they often have two or more different pain diagnoses, are prone to misuse of analgesics and are severely impaired. They are at increased risk for developmental stagnation. Adequate treatment and referral are essential to interrupt progression of the chronic pain process into adulthood.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2431-12-54

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Distribution of children with chronic pain by age and gender.Note. Chi2-test: *** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05.
Figure 1 Distribution of children with chronic pain by age and gender.Note. Chi2-test: *** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Relationship between age at pain onset and first appointment.
Figure 2 Relationship between age at pain onset and first appointment.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Emotional distress of children by main pain locations.Note. Figure 3a) number of children with clinically relevant values in depression (Chi2(2) = 15.163; p < 001; Cramer’s V = .1) and general anxiety (Chi2(2) = 20.066; p < 001; Cramer’s V = .1); a T-value >60 is clinically relevant. Figure 3b) mean values of depression and anxiety scores; analyzed by ANOVA (Depression: F(2, 1584) = 13.977; p < 0.001; eta2 = 0.02; General Anxiety: F(2, 1558) = 7.704; p < 0.001; eta2 = 0.01). Results of post-hoc tests are depicted in the figure: * p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3 Emotional distress of children by main pain locations.Note. Figure 3a) number of children with clinically relevant values in depression (Chi2(2) = 15.163; p < 001; Cramer’s V = .1) and general anxiety (Chi2(2) = 20.066; p < 001; Cramer’s V = .1); a T-value >60 is clinically relevant. Figure 3b) mean values of depression and anxiety scores; analyzed by ANOVA (Depression: F(2, 1584) = 13.977; p < 0.001; eta2 = 0.02; General Anxiety: F(2, 1558) = 7.704; p < 0.001; eta2 = 0.01). Results of post-hoc tests are depicted in the figure: * p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Factors associated with “extremely high impairment”.
Figure 4 Factors associated with “extremely high impairment”.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wieczerkowski W, Nickel H, Janowksi A, Fittkau B, Rauer W: Angstfragebogen für Schüler (AFS). 1981, Westermann, Göttingen
  2. Stiensmeier-Pelster J, Schürmann M, Duda K: Depressions-Inventar für Kinder und Jugendliche (DIKJ). 2000, Hogrefe, Göttingen

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 214

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zernikow, B., Wager, J., Hechler, T., Hasan, C., Rohr, U., Dobe, M., Meyer, A., Hübner-Möhler, B., Wamsler, C., & Blankenburg, M.
Affiliations
Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Corresponding author
Zernikow, Boris
ORCID
Venue
BMC Pediatrics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-05-16
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
54-54
ISSN
1471-2431 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1471-2431-12-54
PMC
PMC3404028
OpenAlex
W2094181453
Cited by
214
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pediatric chronic pain, pain-related impairment, tension-type headache, migraine, functional abdominal pain, musculoskeletal pain, depression, anxiety, analgesic misuse
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Child Health Services, Child, Preschool, Female, Germany, Headache, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Male, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Abdominal Pain, Logistic Models, Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review