The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Partner relationship satisfaction and maternal emotional distress in early pregnancy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Recognition of maternal emotional distress during pregnancy and the identification of risk factors for this distress are of considerable clinical- and public health importance. The mental health of the mother is important both for herself, and for the physical and psychological health of her children and the welfare of the family. The first aim of the present study was to identify risk factors for maternal emotional distress during pregnancy with special focus on partner relationship satisfaction. The second aim was to assess interaction effects between relationship satisfaction and the main predictors. METHODS: Pregnant women enrolled in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (n = 51,558) completed a questionnaire with questions about maternal emotional distress, relationship satisfaction, and other risk factors. Associations between 37 predictor variables and emotional distress were estimated by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Relationship dissatisfaction was the strongest predictor of maternal emotional distress (β = 0.25). Other predictors were dissatisfaction at work (β = 0.11), somatic disease (β = 0.11), work related stress (β = 0.10) and maternal alcohol problems in the preceding year (β = 0.09). Relationship satisfaction appeared to buffer the effects of frequent moving, somatic disease, maternal smoking, family income, irregular working hours, dissatisfaction at work, work stress, and mother's sick leave (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dissatisfaction with the partner relationship is a significant predictor of maternal emotional distress in pregnancy. A good partner relationship can have a protective effect against some stressors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A recent study suggests relationship dissatisfaction to be the strongest predictor of maternal emotional distress during pregnancy [48,49].”
From Mamma mia: A feasibility study of a web-based intervention to reduce the risk of postpartum depression and enhance subjective well-being (2013) · cites this paper as [49]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
SAUNDERS, J. B., AASLAND, O. G., BABOR, T. F., DE LA FUENTE, J. R., & GRANT, M. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x · Cited by 13,597 · cited 1×
“The first three questions were derived from The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [43] and modified for use in MoBa.”
MethodA Generic Measure of Relationship Satisfaction
Hendrick, S. S. (1988) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352430 · Cited by 2,270
Predictors of Postpartum Depression
Beck, C. T. (2001) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-200109000-00004 · Cited by 1,960
Measuring Marital Quality: A Critical Look at the Dependent Variable
Norton, R. W. (1983) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351302 · Cited by 1,802
Prevalence of Depression During Pregnancy: Systematic Review
Bennett, H. A., Einarson, A., Taddio, A., Koren, G., & Einarson, T. R. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000116689.75396.5f · Cited by 1,725
Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking
White, H. R., & Labouvie, E. W. (1989) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1989.50.30 · Cited by 1,693 · cited 1×
“Five questions from Rutgers Alcohol Problems Index [42] were included in the questionnaire, and were used to construct a summative index for alcohol problems: “Have you ever experienced any of the following problems during the last year in relation to your alcohol consumption: 1) Argued with or had negative feelings f…”
MethodAntenatal maternal stress and long‐term effects on child neurodevelopment: how and why?
Talge, N. M., Neal, C., Glover, V., & the Early Stress, T. R. A. P. S. N. F. A. N. E. O. C. A. A. M. H. (2007) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01714.x · Cited by 1,349
Strand, B. H., Dalgard, O. S., Tambs, K., & Rognerud, M. (2003) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039480310000932 · Cited by 1,304
Self-citationCohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth
Evans, J., Heron, J., Francomb, H., Oke, S., & Golding, J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7307.257 · Cited by 1,273
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Logsdon MC, Birkimer JC, Barbee AP: Social Support Providers for Postpartum Women. J Soc Beh Pers. 1997, 12: 89-102.
- Wittchen HU, Pfister H: DIA-X Interviews (M-CIDI). 1997, Frankfurt, Germany: Swets & Zeitlinger
- Chokka P: Postpartum Depression: Part 1. The Canadian Journal of CME. 2002, 14: 37-48.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fear of childbirth and elective caesarean section: a population-based study
Størksen, H. T., Garthus‐Niegel, S., Adams, S. S., Vangen, S., & Eberhard‐Gran, M. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0655-4 · Cited by 243
Self-citationGarthus‐Niegel, S., Horsch, A., Handtke, E., von Soest, T., Ayers, S., Weidner, K., & Eberhard‐Gran, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01728 · Cited by 182
Self-citationThe buffering effect of relationship satisfaction on emotional distress in couples
Røsand, G.-M. B., Slinning, K., Eberhard‐Gran, M., Røysamb, E., & Tambs, K. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-66 · Cited by 145
Self-citationFigueiredo, B., Canário, C., Tendais, I., Pinto, T. M., Kenny, D. A., & Field, T. M. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.064 · Cited by 95
Haga, S. M., Drozd, F., Brendryen, H., & Slinning, K. (2013) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.2659 · Cited by 84
“A recent study suggests relationship dissatisfaction to be the strongest predictor of maternal emotional distress during pregnancy [48,49].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Røsand, G.-M. B., Slinning, K., Eberhard-Gran, M., Røysamb, E., & Tambs, K.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Røsand, Gun-Mette B
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2011-03-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-161
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3063829
- OpenAlex
- W2020642087
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering (Stiftelsen Dam)
- Norges Forskningsråd (151918/S10)
- National Institutes of Health (n01es085433-000, N01-ES-85433)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UO1-NS-047537, 047537-01, UO1 NS 047537–01, U01NS047537, 1 UO1 NS 047537‐01)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (N01 ES85433, N01-ES, UO1 NS 047537-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- maternal distress, pregnancy, relationship dissatisfaction, risk factors, buffering effect, occupational stress, job dissatisfaction, somatic diseases, maternal smoking, household income, sick leave, irregular working hours
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mothers, Norway, Personal Satisfaction, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sexual Partners, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
