Cited by 2,270Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingFamily Dynamics and Relationships

A Generic Measure of Relationship Satisfaction

Hendrick, Susan S.·1988·Journal of Marriage and the Family

Abstract

The variety of interpersonal relationships contemporary society necessitates the development of brief, reliable measures of satisfaction that are applicable to many types of close relationships. This article describes the development of such a measure. In Study I, the 7-item Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) was administered to 125 subjects who reported themselves to be in love. Analyses revealed a unifactorial scale structure, substantial factor loadings, and moderate intercorrelations among the items. The scale correlated significantly with measures of love, sexual attitudes, self-disclosure, commitment, and investment a relationship. In Study II, the scale was administered to 57 couples ongoing relationships. Analyses supported a single factor, alpha reliability of .86, and correlations with relevant relationship measures. The scale correlated .80 with a longer criterion measure, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1976), and both scales were effective (with a subsample) discriminating couples who stayed together from couples who broke up. The RAS is a brief, psychometrically sound, generic measure of relationship satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/352430

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendrick, S. S.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University (US)
Corresponding author
Hendrick, Susan S.
Venue
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988-02
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
93
ISSN
0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074822467
Cited by
2,270
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 84
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marriage and the Family (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
relationship satisfaction, Relationship Assessment Scale, scale development, close relationships, romantic love, couples, relationship commitment, self-disclosure, sexual attitudes, relationship investment, breakup, Dyadic Adjustment Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review