The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Newspaper coverage of mental illness in the UK, 1992-2008
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Recent years have seen a number of attempts to reduce the stigma related to mental illness; the media can play a significant role in perpetuating this stigma. This paper analyses trends in newspaper coverage of mental illness in the UK between 1992-2008 across a range of psychiatric diagnoses. METHODS: A content analysis was performed on a sample of articles (n = 1361) about mental illness in a range of UK newspapers in 1992, 2000, and 2008. RESULTS: There was a significant proportional reduction in negative articles about mental illness between 1992 and 2008, and a significant increase in articles explaining psychiatric disorders. Coverage improved for depression but remained largely negative for schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: Newspaper coverage of mental illness became less stigmatising overall in the 1990s and 2000s, but this was not true for all diagnoses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“During the Time to Change antistigma programme in England, for example, coverage of mental health issues by newspapers has substantially improved.[260][261][262]”
From The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health (2022) · cites this paper as [260]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363 · Cited by 8,848
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678
Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance.
Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Bresnahan, M., Stueve, A., & Pescosolido, B. A. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1328 · Cited by 1,949 · cited 2×
“With regards public opinion, the improvement in views on depression [19], as well as the more negative views held about schizophrenia [20-22], mirrors patterns found in the coverage.”
BackgroundMental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma
Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004 · Cited by 1,832
Thornicroft, G. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780198570981.001.0001 · Cited by 656
Stigma as Related to Mental Disorders
Hinshaw, S. P., & Stier, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141245 · Cited by 541
Pescosolido, B. A., Martin, J. K., Lang, A., & Ólafsdóttir, S. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.018 · Cited by 530
The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness
King, M., Dinos, S., Shaw, J., Watson, R. J., Stevens, S., Passetti, F., Weich, S., & Serfaty, M. A. (2007) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024638 · Cited by 419
Shunned: Discrimination Against People With Mental Illness
Guzofski, S. (2007) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.58.5.716 · Cited by 400
Changes in public attitudes to depression during the Defeat Depression Campaign
Paykel, E. S., Hart, D., & Priest, R. G. (1998) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.173.6.519 · Cited by 389 · cited 2×
“With regards public opinion, the improvement in views on depression [19], as well as the more negative views held about schizophrenia [20-22], mirrors patterns found in the coverage.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Francis C, Pirkis J, Dunt D, Blood RW: Mental Health and Illness in the Media. 2001, Melbourne: Australian Department of Health and Aged Care
- Press Complaints Commission: The Evolving Code of Practice. [ http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html ]
- See me so far: A review of the first 4 years of the Scottish anti-stigma campaign. [ http://www.seemescotland.org.uk/images/pdfs/1.6.seemesofar.pdf ]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health
Thornicroft, G., Sunkel, C., Alikhon Aliev, A., Baker, S., Brohan, E., el Chammay, R., Davies, K., Demissie, M., Duncan, J., Fekadu, W., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01470-2 · Cited by 748
Sampogna, G., Bakolis, I., Evans-Lacko, S. E., Robinson, E. J., Thornicroft, G., & Henderson, C. (2017) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.08.008 · Cited by 176
Experiences of discrimination among people Using mental health services in England 2008-2011
Corker, E., Hamilton, S., Henderson, C., Weeks, C., Pinfold, V., Rose, D. S., Williams, P. R., Flach, C., Gill, V., Lewis-Holmes, E., et al. (2013) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.112912 · Cited by 165
Reinforcing Stigmatization: Coverage of Mental Illness in Spanish Newspapers
Aragonès, E., López-Muntaner, J., Ceruelo, S., & Basora, J. (2014) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.872726 · Cited by 119
Evaluation of the Time to Change programme in England 2008-2011
Henderson, C., & Thornicroft, G. (2013) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.112896 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Goulden, R., Corker, E., Evans-Lacko, S., Rose, D., Thornicroft, G., & Henderson, C.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Goulden, Robert
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2011-10-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 796-796
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3205064
- OpenAlex
- W2011287732
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
- Comic Relief
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- King's College London
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Terminology › Medical Research and Practices
- Keywords
- mental illness, media coverage, newspaper articles, stigma, mental health stigma, depression, schizophrenia, psychiatric diagnosis, British press
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, United Kingdom, Health Promotion, Humans, Newspapers as Topic, Public Opinion, Stereotyping, Health Communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
