Cited by 108Mental Health Treatment and AccessJournalism and Media StudiesMedia Studies and Communication

Newspaper coverage of mental illness in England 2008–2011

Open access
Thornicroft, Amalia, Goulden, Robert, Shefer, Guy, Rhydderch, Danielle, Rose, Diana, Williams, Paul, Thornicroft, Graham, Henderson, Claire·2013·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Better newspaper coverage of mental health-related issues is a target for the Time to Change (TTC) anti-stigma programme in England, whose population impact may be influenced by how far concurrent media coverage perpetuates stigma and discrimination. AIMS: To compare English newspaper coverage of mental health-related topics each year of the TTC social marketing campaign (2009-2011) with baseline coverage in 2008. METHOD: Content analysis was performed on articles in 27 local and national newspapers on two randomly chosen days each month. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the proportion of anti-stigmatising articles between 2008 and 2011. There was no concomitant proportional decrease in stigmatising articles, and the contribution of mixed or neutral elements decreased. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide promising results on improvements in press reporting of mental illness during the TTC programme in 2009-2011, and a basis for guidance to newspaper journalists and editors on reporting mental illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.112920

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Newspaper coverage of mental health issues improved substantially during England's Time to Change anti-stigma programme.

    “During the Time to Change antistigma programme in England, for example, coverage of mental health issues by newspapers has substantially improved.[260][261][262]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thornicroft, A., Goulden, R., Shefer, G., Rhydderch, D., Rose, D., Williams, P., Thornicroft, G., & Henderson, C.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Henderson, Claire
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-04
Volume
202
Issue
s55
Pages
s64-s69
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2117153407
Cited by
108
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11
FWCI
18.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • Comic Relief
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1053, NF-SI-0611-10053)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' Charity
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
media coverage of mental illness, newspaper reporting, mental health stigma, England
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, England, Humans, Newspapers as Topic, Stereotyping, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review