Cited by 14Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Baseline predictors of treatment outcome in Internet-based alcohol interventions: a recursive partitioning analysis alongside a randomized trial

Open access
Blankers, Matthijs, Koeter, Maarten WJ, Schippers, Gerard M·2013·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internet-based interventions are seen as attractive for harmful users of alcohol and lead to desirable clinical outcomes. Some participants will however not achieve the desired results. In this study, harmful users of alcohol have been partitioned in subgroups with low, intermediate or high probability of positive treatment outcome, using recursive partitioning classification tree analysis. METHODS: Data were obtained from a randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of two Internet-based alcohol interventions. The main outcome variable was treatment response, a dichotomous outcome measure for treatment success. Candidate predictors for the classification analysis were first selected using univariate regression. Next, a tree decision model to classify participants in categories with a low, medium and high probability of treatment response was constructed using recursive partitioning software. RESULTS: Based on literature review, 46 potentially relevant baseline predictors were identified. Five variables were selected using univariate regression as candidate predictors for the classification analysis. Two variables were found most relevant for classification and selected for the decision tree model: 'living alone', and 'interpersonal sensitivity'. Using sensitivity analysis, the robustness of the decision tree model was supported. CONCLUSIONS: Harmful alcohol users in a shared living situation, with high interpersonal sensitivity, have a significantly higher probability of positive treatment outcome. The resulting decision tree model may be used as part of a decision support system but is on its own insufficient as a screening algorithm with satisfactory clinical utility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (Cochrane Collaboration): NTR-TC1155.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-13-455

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous efforts to identify nontechnological factors influencing attrition in online interventions have yielded inconclusive results.

    “although previous efforts to identify nontechnological factors influencing attrition in online interventions have yielded inconclusive results [71-75].”

    From Short-term effectiveness of web-based guided self-help for phobic outpatients: randomized controlled trial. (2014) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Background (page unavailable) says findings on baseline predictors of alcohol-treatment outcome are mixed and have not always been replicated. The Methods and Discussion (pages unavailable) clarify that this study predicts treatment response, not attrition; its discussion of follow-up attrition does not say that efforts to identify nontechnological predictors of attrition were inconclusive. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Because there was systematic attrition in this trial, the significant differences between completers and dropouts may provide valuable information to identify focal points for targeted attrition reduction.

    “Because there was systematic attrition in this trial, the significant differences between completers and dropouts may provide valuable information to identify focal points for targeted attrition reduction, although previous efforts to identify nontechnological factors influencing attrition in online interventions have yielded inconclusive results [71-75].”

    From Short-term effectiveness of web-based guided self-help for phobic outpatients: randomized controlled trial. (2014) · cites this paper as [71]

    The citation is attached to the statement that previous studies of nontechnological factors influencing attrition in online interventions yielded inconclusive results. The Background and Discussion describe mixed findings about predictors of treatment outcome, not attrition; Methods > Procedure and interventions reports follow-up response rates but does not assess factors influencing dropout. Searches for attrition, dropout, completers, and their predictors found no passage addressing the cited point. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blankers, M., Koeter, M. W., & Schippers, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Jellinek (NL)
  • Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Blankers, Matthijs
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2013-05-07
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
455-455
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171757795
Cited by
14
References
60
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ZonMw (31160006)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (036.002.345)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
hazardous drinking, treatment outcome prediction, baseline predictors, recursive partitioning, classification trees, living alone, interpersonal sensitivity, decision support system, screening algorithm, co-living
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Decision Trees, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prognosis, Regression Analysis, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review