Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 696

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regional alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality in Great Britain: novel insights using retail sales data

Open access
Robinson, Mark, Shipton, Deborah, Walsh, David, Whyte, Bruce, McCartney, Gerry·2015·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regional differences in population levels of alcohol-related harm exist across Great Britain, but these are not entirely consistent with differences in population levels of alcohol consumption. This incongruence may be due to the use of self-report surveys to estimate consumption. Survey data are subject to various biases and typically produce consumption estimates much lower than those based on objective alcohol sales data. However, sales data have never been used to estimate regional consumption within Great Britain (GB). This ecological study uses alcohol retail sales data to provide novel insights into regional alcohol consumption in GB, and to explore the relationship between alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality. METHODS: Alcohol sales estimates derived from electronic sales, delivery records and retail outlet sampling were obtained. The volume of pure alcohol sold was used to estimate per adult consumption, by market sector and drink type, across eleven GB regions in 2010-11. Alcohol-related mortality rates were calculated for the same regions and a cross-sectional correlation analysis between consumption and mortality was performed. RESULTS: Per adult consumption in northern England was above the GB average and characterised by high beer sales. A high level of consumption in South West England was driven by on-trade sales of cider and spirits and off-trade wine sales. Scottish regions had substantially higher spirits sales than elsewhere in GB, particularly through the off-trade. London had the lowest per adult consumption, attributable to lower off-trade sales across most drink types. Alcohol-related mortality was generally higher in regions with higher per adult consumption. The relationship was weakened by the South West and Central Scotland regions, which had the highest consumption levels, but discordantly low and very high alcohol-related mortality rates, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for the ecological relationship between alcohol-related mortality and alcohol consumption. The synthesis of knowledge from a combination of sales, survey and mortality data, as well as primary research studies, is key to ensuring that regional alcohol consumption, and its relationship with alcohol-related harms, is better understood.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-15-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Norstrom T, Skog OJ: Alcohol and mortality: methodological and analytical issues in aggregate analyses.Addiction 2001,96(Suppl 1):S5–17. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Beeston C, Reid G, Robinson M, Craig N, McCartney G, Graham L, Grant I, (on behalf of the MESAS project team): Monitoring and Evaluating Scotland’s Alcohol Strategy. Third Annual Report. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland; 2013.
  3. Twigg L, Moon G: The spatial and temporal development of binge drinking in England 2001–2009: An observational study.Soc Sci Med 2013, 91:162–167. · DOI
  4. Deacon L, Hughes S, Tocque K, Bellis MA: Indications of Public Health in the English Regions 8: Alcohol. York: Association of Public Health Observatories; 2007.
  5. Boniface S, Shelton N: How is alcohol consumption affected if we account for under-reporting? A hypothetical scenario.Eur J Public Health 2013,23(6):1076–1081. 10.1093/eurpub/ckt016 · DOI
  6. Walsh D, Bendel N, Jones R, Hanlon P: Investigating a Glasgow Effect: Why Do Equally Deprived UK Cities Experience Different Health Outcomes?. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health; 2010.
  7. Catto S, Gibbs D: How much are People in Scotland Really Drinking? A Review of Data From Scotland’s Routine Surveys. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland; 2008.
  8. World Health Organization: International Guide for Monitoring Alcohol Consumption and Related Harm. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
  9. Robinson M, Thorpe R, Beeston C, McCartney G: A review of the validity and reliability of alcohol retail sales data for monitoring population levels of alcohol consumption: a Scottish perspective.Alcohol and alcoholism 2013,48(2):231–240. 10.1093/alcalc/ags098 · DOI
  10. Thorpe R, Robinson M, McCartney G, Beeston C: Monitoring and Evaluating Scotland’s Alcohol Strategy: A Review of the Validity and Reliability of Alcohol Retail Sales Data for the Purpose of Monitoring and Evaluating Scotland’s Alcohol Strategy. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland; 2012.
  11. Babor TF, Caetano R, Casswell S, Edwards G, Giesbrecht N, Graham K, Grube JW, Hill L, Holder H, Homel R: Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity: Research and Public Policy: Research and Public Policy. Oxford: OUP Oxford; 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Scottish Government: Changing Scotland’s Relationship with Alcohol: A Framework for Action. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2009.
  13. HM Government: The Government’s Alcohol Strategy. London, UK: HM Government; 2012.
  14. Coghill N, Miller P, Plant M, Future Proof: Can We Afford the Cost of Drinking too much? Mortality, Morbidity and Drink-Driving in the UK. London: Alcohol Concern; 2009.
  15. Makela P, Paljarvi T: Do consequences of a given pattern of drinking vary by socioeconomic status? A mortality and hospitalisation follow-up for alcohol-related causes of the Finnish Drinking Habits Surveys.J Epidemiol Community Health 2008,62(8):728. 10.1136/jech.2007.065672 · DOI · Paper page
  16. McCartney G, Collins C, Walsh D, Batty D: Accounting for Scotland’s Excess Mortality: Towards a Synthesis. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health; 2011.
  17. Booth A, Meier P, Stockwell T, Sutton A, Wilkinson A, Wong R, Brennan A, OÆReilly D, Purshouse R, Taylor K: Independent Review of the Effects of Alcohol Pricing and Promotion. Part A: Systematic Reviews. Sheffield: University of Sheffield; 2008.
  18. Black H, Gill J, Chick J: The price of a drink: levels of consumption and price paid per unit of alcohol by Edinburgh’s ill drinkers with a comparison to wider alcohol sales in Scotland.Addiction 2011,106(4):729–736. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03225.x · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03225.x
  19. Griffith R, Leicester A: The Impact of Introducing a Minimum Price on Alcohol in Britain. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies; 2010.
  20. VisitBritain: Inbound Tourism to Britain’s Nations and Regions. London, UK: VisitBritain; 2013.
  21. Wilkinson RG: Income distribution and life expectancy.BMJ 1992,304(6820):165–168. 10.1136/bmj.304.6820.165 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 696

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, M., Shipton, D., Walsh, D., Whyte, B., & McCartney, G.
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2015-01-07
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160805609
Cited by
696
References
2
FWCI
50.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality in Great Britain: novel insights using retail sales data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2458-15-1
The paper
Robinson, M., Shipton, D., Walsh, D., Whyte, B., & McCartney, G. (2015). Regional alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality in Great Britain: novel insights using retail sales data. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-15-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.