The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association between health information, use of protective devices and occurrence of acute health problems in the Prestige oil spill clean-up in Asturias and Cantabria (Spain): a cross-sectional study
Open accessAbstract
Background: This paper examines the association between use of protective devices, frequency of acute health problems and health-protection information received by participants engaged in the Prestige oil spill clean-up in Asturias and Cantabria, Spain. Methods: We studied 133 seamen, 135 bird cleaners, 266 volunteers and 265 paid workers selected by random sampling, stratified by type of worker and number of working days. Information was collected by telephone interview conducted in June 2003. The association of interest was summarized, using odds ratios (OR) obtained from logistic regression. Results: Health-protection briefing was associated with use of protective devices and clothing. Uninformed subjects registered a significant excess risk of itchy eyes (OR:2.89; 95%CI:1.21–6.90), nausea/vomiting/dizziness (OR:2.25; 95%CI:1.17–4.32) and throat and respiratory problems (OR:2.30; 95%CI:1.15–4.61). There was a noteworthy significant excess risk of headaches (OR:3.86: 95%CI:1.74–8.54) and respiratory problems (OR:2.43; 95%CI:1.02–5.79) among uninformed paid workers. Seamen, the group most exposed to the fuel-oil, were the worst informed and registered the highest frequency of toxicological problems. Conclusion: Proper health-protection briefing was associated with greater use of protective devices and lower frequency of health problems. Among seamen, however, the results indicate poorer dissemination of information and the need of specific guidelines for removing fuel-oil at sea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional consequences of inadequate sleep in adolescents: A systematic review
Shochat, T., Cohen-Zion, M., & Tzischinsky, O. (2014) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2013.03.005 · Cited by 837
Delayed school start times and adolescent sleep: A systematic review of the experimental evidence
Minges, K. E., & Redeker, N. S. (2016) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2015.06.002 · Cited by 338
Mirand, A., Henquell, C., Archimbaud, C., Ughetto, S., Antona, D., Bailly, J.-L., & Peigue-Lafeuille, H. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03789.x · Cited by 273
School-based sleep promotion programs: Effectiveness, feasibility and insights for future research
Cassoff, J., Knäuper, B., Michaelsen, S., & Gruber, R. (2013) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2012.07.001 · Cited by 118
Boggero, I. A., Hostinar, C. E., Haak, E. A., Murphy, M. L. M., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2017) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.058 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrasco, J. M., Lope, V., Pérez-Gómez, B., Aragonés, N., Suárez, B., López-Abente, G., Rodríguez-Artalejo, F., & Pollán, M.
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2006-01-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1495037751
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between health information, use of protective devices and occurrence of acute health problems in the Prestige oil spill clean-up in Asturias and Cantabria (Spain): a cross-sectional study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2458-6-1
- The paper
- Carrasco, J. M., Lope, V., Pérez-Gómez, B., Aragonés, N., Suárez, B., López-Abente, G., Rodríguez-Artalejo, F., & Pollán, M. (2006). Association between health information, use of protective devices and occurrence of acute health problems in the Prestige oil spill clean-up in Asturias and Cantabria (Spain): a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.