The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A high-throughput cell migration assay using scratch wound healing, a comparison of image-based readout methods
Open accessAbstract
Background: Cell migration is a complex phenomenon that requires the coordination of numerous cellular processes. Investigation of cell migration and its underlying biology is of interest to basic scientists and those in search of therapeutics. Current migration assays for screening small molecules, siRNAs, or other perturbations are difficult to perform in parallel at the scale required to screen large libraries. Results: We have adapted the commonly used scratch wound healing assay of tissue-culture cell monolayers to a 384 well plate format. By mechanically scratching the cell substrate with a pin array, we are able to create characteristically sized wounds in all wells of a 384 well plate. Imaging of the healing wounds with an automated fluorescence microscope allows us to distinguish perturbations that affect cell migration, morphology, and division. Readout requires ~1 hr per plate but is high in information content i.e. high content. We compare readouts using different imaging technologies, automated microscopy, scanners and a fluorescence macroscope, and evaluate the trade-off between information content and data acquisition rate. Conclusions: The adaptation of a wound healing assay to a 384 well format facilitates the study of aspects of cell migration, tissue reorganization, cell division, and other processes that underlie wound healing. This assay allows greater than 10,000 perturbations to be screened per day with a quantitative, high-content readout, and can also be used to characterize small numbers of perturbations in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound
Poujade, M., Grasland-Mongrain, E., Hertzog, A., Jouanneau, J., Chavrier, P., Ladoux, B., Buguin, A., & Silberzan, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705062104 · Cited by 912
Velocity Fields in a Collectively Migrating Epithelium
Petitjean, L., Reffay, M., Grasland-Mongrain, E., Poujade, M., Ladoux, B., Buguin, A., & Silberzan, P. (2010) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.030 · Cited by 342
Mohanta, Y. K., Panda, S. K., Jayabalan, R., Sharma, N., Bastia, A. K., & Mohanta, T. K. (2017) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2017.00014 · Cited by 308
Hawkins, D., & Abrahamse, H. (2006) · Photomedicine and Laser Surgery · doi:10.1089/pho.2006.24.705 · Cited by 279
Evangelisti, C., Florian, M. C., Massimi, I., Dominici, C., Giannini, G., Galardi, S., Buè, M. C., Massalini, S., McDowell, H. P., Messi, E., et al. (2009) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.09-134965 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Yarrow, J. C., Perlman, Z. E., Westwood, N. J., & Mitchison, T. J.
- Venue
- BMC Biotechnology
- Published
- 2004-09-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-21
- ISSN
- 1472-6750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095685494
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A high-throughput cell migration assay using scratch wound healing, a comparison of image-based readout methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6750-4-21
- The paper
- Yarrow, J. C., Perlman, Z. E., Westwood, N. J., & Mitchison, T. J. (2004). A high-throughput cell migration assay using scratch wound healing, a comparison of image-based readout methods. BMC Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.