Cited by 26Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationDental Research and COVID-19

IQuaD dental trial; improving the quality of dentistry: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing oral hygiene advice and periodontal instrumentation for the prevention and management of periodontal disease in dentate adults attending dental primary care

Open access
Clarkson, Jan E, Ramsay, Craig R, Averley, Paul, Bonetti, Debbie, Boyers, Dwayne, Campbell, Louise, Chadwick, Graham R, Duncan, Anne +28 more·2013·BMC Oral Health

Abstract

Background: Periodontal disease is the most common oral disease affecting adults, and although it is largely preventable it remains the major cause of poor oral health worldwide. Accumulation of microbial dental plaque is the primary aetiological factor for both periodontal disease and caries. Effective self-care (tooth brushing and interdental aids) for plaque control and removal of risk factors such as calculus, which can only be removed by periodontal instrumentation (PI), are considered necessary to prevent and treat periodontal disease thereby maintaining periodontal health. Despite evidence of an association between sustained, good oral hygiene and a low incidence of periodontal disease and caries in adults there is a lack of strong and reliable evidence to inform clinicians of the relative effectiveness (if any) of different types of Oral Hygiene Advice (OHA). The evidence to inform clinicians of the effectiveness and optimal frequency of PI is also mixed. There is therefore an urgent need to assess the relative effectiveness of OHA and PI in a robust, sufficiently powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) in primary dental care. Methods/Design: This is a 5 year multi-centre, randomised, open trial with blinded outcome evaluation based in dental primary care in Scotland and the North East of England. Practitioners will recruit 1860 adult patients, with periodontal health, gingivitis or moderate periodontitis (Basic Periodontal Examination Score 0–3). Dental practices will be cluster randomised to provide routine OHA or Personalised OHA. To test the effects of PI each individual patient participant will be randomised to one of three groups: no PI, 6 monthly PI (current practice), or 12 monthly PI. Baseline measures and outcome data (during a three year follow-up) will be assessed through clinical examination, patient questionnaires and NHS databases. The primary outcome measures at 3 year follow up are gingival inflammation/bleeding on probing at the gingival margin; oral hygiene self-efficacy and net benefits. Discussion: IQuaD will provide evidence for the most clinically-effective and cost-effective approach to managing periodontal disease in dentate adults in Primary Care. This will support general dental practitioners and patients in treatment decision making. Trial registration: Protocol ID: ISRCTN56465715

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6831-13-58

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recently completed UK trial demonstrated no clinical benefit in providing either 6 or 12 monthly scale and polishes.

    “A recently completed UK trial demonstrated no clinical benefit in providing either 6 or 12 monthly scale and polishes.68”

    From Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action. (2019) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Methods/Design section describes a UK trial comparing no periodontal instrumentation with six- and twelve-monthly instrumentation. But it describes planned interventions and future outcome measurement, not a completed trial, and reports no finding that either schedule lacked clinical benefit. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Papapanou PN Epidemiology of periodontal diseases: an update J Int Acad Periodontol 1999 13 110 116 12666955
  2. Neely AL Holford TR Löe H Ånerud Å Boysen H The natural history of periodontal disease in man. Risk factors for progression of attachment loss in individuals receiving no oral health care J Periodontol 2001 13 8 1006 1015 10.1902/jop.2001.72.8.1006 11525431 · DOI
  3. Ekstrand KR Bruun G Bruun M Plaque and gingival status as indicators for caries progression on approximal surfaces Caries Res 1998 13 1 41 45 10.1159/000016428 9438570 · DOI
  4. Axelsson P Nystrom B Lindhe J The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries, and periodontal disease in adults J Clin Periodontol 2004 13 749 757 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00563.x 15312097 · DOI
  5. Watt RG Marinho VC Does oral health promotion improve oral hygiene and gingival health? Periodontol 2005 13 35 47 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2004.03796.x 15655024 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Renz A Ide M Newton T Robinson P Smith D Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal diseases Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005097.pub2 17443571 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kay E Locker DA A systematic review of the effectiveness of oral health promotion aimed at improving oral health Community Dent Health 1998 13 132 144 10645682
  8. Sprod AJ Anderson R Treasure ET Effective oral health promotion: literature review. Technical Report 20 1996 Cardiff: Health Promotion Wales and University of Wales College of Medicine
  9. Beirne PV Worthington HV Clarkson JE Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004625.pub3 17943824 · DOI
  10. Gaunt F Devine M Pennington M Vernazza C Gwynnett E Steen N Heasman P The cost-effectiveness of supportive periodontal care for patients with chronic periodontitis J Clin Periodontol 2008 13 Suppl. 8 67 82 18724842
  11. Bandura A Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory Psychol Health 1998 13 623 649 10.1080/08870449808407422 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Löe H The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems J Periodontol 1967 13 610 616 5237684
  13. Slade GD Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997 13 284 290 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x 9332805 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fielding S Fayers PM Ramsay CR Investigating the missingness mechanism in quality of life data: a comparison of approaches Health Qual Life Outcome [Online] 2009 13 57 doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-57. Available from: http://www.hqlo.com/content/pdf/1477-7525-7-57.pdf PMC2711047 19545408 · DOI
  15. Ryan M Gerard K Using discrete choice experiments to value health care: current practice and future prospects Appl Health Econ Policy Anal 2003 13 55 64 14619274
  16. Louviere JJ Hensher DA Swait JD Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application 2000 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  17. Maddala G Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics 1983 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  18. McCormack K Wake B Perez J Fraser C Cook J McIntosh E Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair Health Technol Assess 2005 13 14 15842951
  19. Clarkson JE Young L Ramsay CR Bonner BC Bonetti D How to influence patient oral hygiene behaviour effectively J Dent Res 2009 13 10 933 937 10.1177/0022034509345627 19783802 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarkson, J. E., Ramsay, C. R., Averley, P., Bonetti, D., Boyers, D., Campbell, L., Chadwick, G. R., Duncan, A., Elders, A., Gouick, J., Hall, A. F., Heasman, L., Heasman, P. A., Hodge, P. J., Jones, C., Laird, M., Lamont, T. J., Lovelock, L. A., Madden, I., McCombes, W., McCracken, G. I., McDonald, A. M., McPherson, G., Macpherson, L. E., Mitchell, F. E., Norrie, J. D., Pitts, N. B., van der Pol, M., Ricketts, D. N., Ross, M. K., Steele, J. G., Swan, M., Tickle, M., Watt, P. D., Worthington, H. V., & Young, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • NHS Education for Scotland (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Lamont, Thomas J
Venue
BMC Oral Health
Published
2013-10-26
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
58-58
ISSN
1472-6831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165641369
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Oral Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Dundee
  • Scottish Government
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (09/01/45)
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme (09/01/45)
  • NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
periodontal disease, oral hygiene advice, periodontal instrumentation, gingivitis, periodontitis, plaque control, dental calculus, oral hygiene self-efficacy, gingival bleeding on probing, primary dental care, dental caries prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Counseling, Dental Calculus, Dental Care, Dental Plaque, Dental Prophylaxis, Follow-Up Studies, Gingival Hemorrhage, Gingivitis, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Pocket, Periodontitis, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Quality of Life, Self Care, Toothbrushing, Health Behavior, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review