Cited by 18Health Policy Implementation ScienceDental Education, Practice, ResearchEthics in Clinical Research

Practical considerations for conducting dental clinical trials in primary care

Open access
Martin-Kerry, J. M., Lamont, T. J., Keightley, A., Calache, H., Martin, R., Floate, R., Princi, K., de Silva, A. M.·2015·British Dental Journal

Abstract

There is increasing importance placed on conducting clinical trials in dentistry to provide a robust evidence base for the treatment provided, and models of care delivered. However, providing the evidence upon which to base such decisions is not straightforward, as the conduct of these trials is complex. Currently, only limited information is available about the strategies to deliver successful clinical trials in primary care settings, and even less available on dental clinical trials. Considerable knowledge and experience is lost once a trial is completed as details about effective management of a trial are generally not reported or disseminated to trial managers and researchers. This leads to loss of vital knowledge that could assist with the effective delivery of new trials. The aim of this study is to examine the conduct and delivery of five dental clinical trials across both Australia and the UK and identify the various factors that impacted upon their implementation. Findings suggest that early stakeholder engagement, and well-designed and managed trials, lead to improved outcomes for researchers, clinic staff and patients, and increases the potential for future dissemination and translation of information into practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.498

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite the vast majority of dental services being provided in primary dental care, few randomised controlled trials have taken place or are underway in this setting.

    “Despite the vast majority of dental services being provided in primary dental care, few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have taken place or are underway in this setting [1].”

    From Parental attitudes to randomised controlled trials in primary dental care: A qualitative study (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction and Background (page unavailable) says that dental trials have often been small and that little has been published about how to conduct trials in primary care. It does not say that most dental services are provided there or that few primary-care RCTs have taken place or are underway. Searches for those claims found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. Gilbert GH, Richman JS, Gordan VV, Rindal B, Fellows JL, Benjamin PL, Wallace-Dawson M, Williams OD, for the DPBRN Collaborative Group. J Dent Educ 2011;75:453-465.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin-Kerry, J. M., Lamont, T. J., Keightley, A., Calache, H., Martin, R., Floate, R., Princi, K., & de Silva, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (AU)
Venue
British Dental Journal
Published
2015-06
Volume
218
Issue
11
Pages
629-634
ISSN
  • 0007-0610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5373
OpenAlex
W2103581953
Cited by
18
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BDJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (07/44/03, 09/01/45, 06/35/99)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
primary care, trial conduct, stakeholder engagement, trial management, knowledge translation, evidence-based dentistry
MeSH terms
Australia, Dental Care, Dental Instruments, Humans, Primary Health Care, Scotland, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Selection, Dental Research, Resource Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review