Cited by 14Dental Health and Care UtilizationSchool Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Barriers to adopting and implementing an oral health programme for managing early childhood caries through primary health care providers in Lima, Peru

Open access
Pesaressi, Eraldo, Villena, Rita S, van der Sanden, Wil JM, Mulder, Jan, Frencken, Jo E·2014·BMC Oral Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To identify barriers to participation in a primary oral health care programme aimed at preventing early childhood caries, as perceived by nurses. METHODS: Of a total of 140 randomly selected nurses employed in 40 government health centres in Lima, 123 completed a pre-tested questionnaire. Background variables were districts' 'socio-economic status' (SES) and 'years of experience'. Factor analysis was performed. ANOVA was applied for testing the influence of the background variables on the barrier factors. Chi-square test was applied to test for differences between single item barriers and the background variables. The Likert-scale (1-4) was used. RESULTS: There was no statistical significant effect of 'SES' or of 'years of experience' of nurses on any of the 7 barrier factors, nor on the 11 single item barrier factors. The highest mean score (3.81) was obtained for the barrier factor 'importance of oral health', followed by 'perceived responsibility' (3.44). The lowest mean score was (1.70) for 'knowledge on caries prevention'. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses consider oral health very important and are willing to participate actively in programmes aimed at reducing Early Childhood Caries, provided that they will be trained well and that the director and dentists of the health centre give their consent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6831-14-17

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to some studies in North Carolina and Peru, primary care physicians and nurses were able to identify their role and assumed responsibility in taking care of oral health of their patients.

    “According to some studies conducted in North Carolina and Peru, primary care physicians and nurses were able to identify their role and assumed their responsibility in taking care of the oral health of their patients.”

    From Barriers and facilitators in the integration of oral health into primary care: a scoping review (2017) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) says nurses in Lima perceived a role in helping maintain children's oral health and were willing to advise parents. It does not show that they had already assumed those duties: participation depended on training and consent from the health-centre director and dentist. This study concerns nurses in Peru, not physicians or providers in North Carolina. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pesaressi, E., Villena, R. S., van der Sanden, W. J., Mulder, J., & Frencken, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de San Martín de Porres (PE)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Villena, Rita S
Venue
BMC Oral Health
Published
2014-03-06
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
17-17
ISSN
1472-6831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121393043
Cited by
14
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Oral Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
early childhood caries, primary care, nurses, dental caries prevention, nurse training, perceived responsibility, socioeconomic status, Lima
MeSH terms
Workforce, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Preschool, Counseling, Dental Caries, Education, Nursing, Female, Health Promotion, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Male, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nurses, Oral Health, Peru, Primary Health Care, Professional-Family Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Class, Social Responsibility, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review