The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: An observed decrease of physician scientists in medical practice has generated much recent interest in increasing the exposure of research programs in medical school. The aim of this study was to review the experience and attitudes regarding research by medical students in Canada. METHODS: An anonymous, cross-sectional, self-report questionnaire was administered to second and fourth year students in three medical schools in Ontario between February and May of 2005. Questions were primarily closed-ended and consisted of Likert scales. Descriptive and correlative statistics were used to analyze the responses between students of different years and previous research experience. RESULTS: There was a 47% (327/699) overall response rate to the questionnaire. Despite 87% of respondents reporting that they had been involved in some degree of research prior to medical school, 43% report that they have not been significantly involved in research activity during medical school and 24% had no interest in any participation. There were significant differences in the attitudes towards research endeavors during medical school between students in their fourth year compared to second year. The greatest barriers to involvement in research in medical school appear to be time, availability of research mentors, formal teaching of research methodology and the perception that the student would not receive appropriate acknowledgement for work put towards a research project. CONCLUSION: The results of this self-report survey outline the significant differences in attitudes towards mandatory research as a component of critical inquiry and scholarship in the undergraduate curriculum in Ontario medical schools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychiatry Residents' Participation in Research: A Survey of Attitudes and Experience
Fitz-Gerald, M. J. (2001) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ap.25.1.42 · Cited by 23
Cited by
Basavareddy, A., & Pallamparthy, S. (2019) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/picr.picr_1_18 · Cited by 117
Barriers Experienced by Medical Students in Conducting Research at Undergraduate Level
Kumar, J., Memon, A., Kumar, A., Kumari, R., Kumar, B., & Fareed, S. (2019) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.4452 · Cited by 54
Alsaleem, S. A., Alkhairi, M. A. Y., Alzahrani, M. A. A., Alwadai, M. I., Alqahtani, S. S. A., Alaseri, Y. F. Y., Alqarni, M. A. M., Assiri, S. A., Alsaleem, M. A., & Mahmood, S. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.706778 · Cited by 48
U.S. Dental Students’ Attitudes Toward Research and Science: Impact of Research Experience
Holman, S. D., Wietecha, M. S., Gullard, A., & Peterson, J. M. B. (2014) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.3.tb05684.x · Cited by 38
Barriers faced by undergraduate dental students when conducting research: a qualitative study
Sarhan, M. M., Aljohani, L. N., Alsaleh, R. I., Mubaraki, R. A., Almozaen, M. A., & Alharbi, R. S. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-06790-y · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Siemens, D. R., Punnen, S., Wong, J., & Kanji, N.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Education
- Published
- 2010-01-22
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-4
- ISSN
- 1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084166896
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6920-10-4
- The paper
- Siemens, D. R., Punnen, S., Wong, J., & Kanji, N. (2010). A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.