Cited by 117Health and Medical Research ImpactsHealth Sciences Research and EducationInnovations in Medical Education

Knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers toward research among medical students: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey

Open access
Basavareddy, Asha, Pallamparthy, Srivani·2019·Perspectives in Clinical Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Research in medicine has an impact on prevention, diagnosis, and newer treatment for the medical ailments. It has brought reforms in policies for health-care programs. Involvement of undergraduates in research was less, so this study was planned to determine the factors and their perception toward the same. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate knowledge, attitude, experience, and the barriers of research among medical undergraduates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted after the protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and obtaining written informed consent from participants. The predesigned validated questionnaire containing 34 questions was used. Filled questionnaires were received from the medical undergraduates of different phases of MBBS from our institute. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 89% (267/300) responded, 140/267 were females. The knowledge score regarding the concept of research and its methodology was 2405/3458 (70%). Sixty percent strongly agreed to include research in undergraduate curriculum, 57% believed that it would facilitate better understanding of the subject and clinical practice (41%). Nearly 56% opined that research was not waste of time and does not interfere in studies. Barriers for research were lack of awareness (53%), interest (54%), funds (62%), time (59%), and difficulty in follow-up of patients (67%). Almost 59% of students disagreed to lack of encouragement by faculty. CONCLUSION: Most of the participants had knowledge regarding research and expressed positive attitude toward involvement in research activity. Some of barriers were lack of awareness, time, funds, and difficulty in patient follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/picr.picr_1_18

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature rarely included detailed qualitative methodology to understand the details and contexts of student research obstacles.

    “Second, the literature in this area rarely included detailed qualitative methodology, which is vital if we are to understand the details and contexts of student research obstacles.”

    From Barriers faced by undergraduate dental students when conducting research: a qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Materials and Methods section describes this paper’s Likert-scale questionnaire, and the Discussion says studies of Indian undergraduates’ opinions on research are meager. Neither passage assesses how often the literature uses detailed qualitative methods or says those methods are needed to understand the context of students’ research obstacles. Searches for qualitative methodology and contextual accounts of barriers found no such statement in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basavareddy, A., & Pallamparthy, S.
Affiliations
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College (IN)
Corresponding author
Basavareddy, Asha
Venue
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Published
2019
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
73
ISSN
2229-3485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2931962757
Cited by
117
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Perspectives in Clinical Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
medical students, undergraduate research, research knowledge, attitudes toward research, barriers to research, research experience, research funding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review